Search results

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!

    • Register Log in
    1. S

      Big SCOTUS conference coming up 5/16 on Assault Weapons Bans

      No matter how many cases SCOTUS rules upon, certain circuits will try to work around them. This is just how it goes. On the flip side, we now have a majority of constitutional carry states and growing. It's only a matter of time before more pro-2A decisions are handed down. Whether that time is...
    2. S

      Big SCOTUS conference coming up 5/16 on Assault Weapons Bans

      It is Firearms Policy Coalition's case tracker that I obtained the info from. Airtable is just the web app they use to display the data nicely.
    3. S

      Big SCOTUS conference coming up 5/16 on Assault Weapons Bans

      Seven cases are headed to SCOTUS conference on 5/16, one of them being Bianchi v. Brown a Maryland case. Given the grouping here, hopefully at least one of them is chosen to be taken up by the court. I'm sure others are tracking this as well but I know there are also likely people here who would...
    4. S

      Garland v VanDerStok SCOTUS Petition, Ghost Guns

      Official grant of cert notice: https://www.supremecourt.gov/qp/23-00852qp.pdf https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/24grantednotedlist.pdf
    5. S

      Challenges to ATF “Ghost Gun” Final Rule (ATF 2021R-05) Megathread

      Source: https://www.supremecourt.gov/qp/23-00852qp.pdf https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/24grantednotedlist.pdf Indeed it has.
    6. S

      Maryland bill will allow lawsuits against gun industry, but gun tax hike fails.

      It's yet another bloomburg promoted and lobbied piece of legislation that will do nothing and waste a bunch of time and money on frivolous suits. .
    7. S

      Cali judge tosses 1/month purchase limit

      SCOTUS involvement is ultimately going to be needed I think. This is another case with an obvious outcome but will take forever to get there.
    8. S

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      What are we placing the odds at for remand to district court vs. SCOTUS intervention (or some combination thereof)?
    9. S

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      2 more days until oral arguments in the 4th circuit.
    10. S

      Rifle purchase 18-21 year olds

      Yep 10 business days. Expect availability on March 20. Maybe the 19th if you get lucky.
    11. S

      Cali judge tosses 1/month purchase limit

      Great minds think a like. I just posted the same thing not 30 seconds after you did. I requested my thread be closed/merged here. Important excerpt: CourtListener Link...
    12. S

      Cali judge tosses 1/month purchase limit

      Important excerpt: CourtListener Link: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18759616/nguyen-v-becerra/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc FPC Link: https://www.firearmspolicy.org/nguyen Order...
    13. S

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      Correct I should have been more careful with the wording there. I knew what I meant to say and it didn't come out right.
    14. S

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      While I completely agree, this was also entirely expected. It would have been highly unusual for SCOTUS to deny the extension given they already (edit made here) had the chance to hear the case, but GVR'd it, and are now waiting for 4th circuit en banc to happen which just so happens to be...
    15. S

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      SCOTUS Docket 23-863 is also updated with a motion by Brown to delay the state's response by a month citing the en banc as a reason. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-863/302433/20240306154625010_2024-03-06%20Bianchi%20Letter%20to%20Court%20re%20Extension.pdf...
    16. S

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      Thanks you are awesome for that. Hopefully the groundwork is properly laid to back 4th circuit into a corner such that it results in a highly favorable SCOTUS opinion in the future.
    17. S

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      Can we get a summary of this for those who don't have 30 minutes to figure out what the actual meaning is? Mark is fine and all but his videos only have about 2 minutes of actual content and the rest is filler words.
    18. S

      We need this in Maryland. Liability of property owners that create gun free zones.

      I'd be fine with it. I'd rather just get a federal law making gun free zones unenforceable all together in spaces open to the public.
    19. S

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      The 4th Circuit seems to have misplaced their paperwork and will be working as hard they can to find it. :whack:
    20. S

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      Yup. In summary of case for those not following as closely: 4th Circuit En Banc hearing is March 20th Also while we are waiting, a petition for Writ of Certiorari (No. 23-863) has been filed with SCOTUS in attempt to force 4th Circuit to do something. The idea is that if 4th Circuit doesn't...
    Top Bottom