More on Abramski: http://capegazette.villagesoup.com/...ct-federal-firearms-background-checks/1097487
Could not find the actual brief.
Could not find the actual brief.
There seems to be a lot of cases that should be working there way up to SCOTUS
IMHO a hidden benefit of this ruling is most cases, in lower courts, passed using other than Strict scrutiny may be open for re-visitation.SCOTUS ruling on Bruen is published! "..the Second and Fourteenth Amendments protect an individual’s right to carry a handgun for self-defense outside the home.”
Full ruling is in the attached.
Thomas rejected end means scrutiny in this case, so even strict scrutiny is out the window.IMHO a hidden benefit of this ruling is most cases, in lower courts, passed using other than Strict scrutiny may be open for re-visitation.
God Bless him.Thomas rejected end means scrutiny in this case, so even strict scrutiny is out the window.
So likely a whole slew or revisitations including maybe denial of recent legislation?Thomas rejected end means scrutiny in this case, so even strict scrutiny is out the window.
The issue is how many of those cases that were loses would of been wins if the courts hadn't played the intermediate scrutiny card. How many of those cases are not even directly citable now due to incorrect use of means end scrutiny.So likely a whole slew or revisitations including maybe denial of recent legislation?
23) NRAJennings D'Cruzv. McCraw et al (TX CCW restrictions for 18-20 year olds) NRA5th Circuit Court of Appeals Filed: 1/31/12 Case: 12-10091Internet Archive: http://www.archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.txnd.199405/gov.uscourts.txnd.199405.docket.htmlOn Deck: SCOTUS Cert Denied.
“The issue is whether prohibiting law-abiding 18-to-20-year-olds from carrying a handgun in public for self-defense is consistent with this Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation,” Judge Mark Pittman ruled in a Thursday opinion.
“Based on the Second Amendment’s text, as informed by Founding-Era history and tradition, the Court concludes that the Second Amendment protects against this prohibition. Texas’s statutory scheme must therefore be enjoined to the extent that law-abiding 18-to-20-year-olds are prohibited from applying for a license to carry a handgun.”
Pittman analyzed the application of other amendments — namely the First and Fourth — to the 18-20 age cohort, and ruled “because neither [of those amendments exclude] 18-to-20-year-olds, the Court declines to read an implicit age restriction into the Second Amendment.”