So- copper is fine.View attachment 453178
What? But I thought lead-free ammo is so super-deadly killier that it needed to be named and restricted in the FSA 2013...
So- copper is fine.View attachment 453178
What? But I thought lead-free ammo is so super-deadly killier that it needed to be named and restricted in the FSA 2013...
Maybe not. Since muzzle loaders aren't firearms, perhaps muzzle loading projectiles aren't "ammunition".I guess this will eliminate using a cap and ball revolver for deer hunting as I don't know of a non-lead replacement projectile for these. But I may just be uninformed.
Age Verification - NRA
www.nraila.org
We both were. Was the last time we hunted there.His crime, was going to Guinea Island in the first place, which happens to be public ground without asking permission in a backwards ass jurisdiction.
He didn't get fined, he was re- educated!
View attachment 453178
What? But I thought lead-free ammo is so super-deadly killier that it needed to be named and restricted in the FSA 2013...
DU has been on the list since the list was originally made, back in 1989.Depleted uranium made the list lolol
I believe the "banned in commission of a crime" list was already in effect when the DC sniper's happened. I would have to go back and look at the legislative history to be sure.IT DOES AFFECT you, SG.
When you go out to commit violent crimes, you won't be able to use leaded ammo unless you want to be arrested for breaking this new law.
In other words, the DC snipers could have really F'd up, killing all those people with Toxic ammo. which will be the new law.
You are reading it wrong.Squaregrouper, unless I am reading part b wrong, they are forbidding use of those banned substances when you go out to commit crimes.
I used two 9mm spent casings as exhaust pipes on my son’s pinewood derby car one year. It ran terrible but looked cool.My bullets identify as Pinewood Derby weights.
dblas,You are reading it wrong.
What you are reading is the current law that is affect today.
They have yet to make the actual bill they are proposing public, which is odd since we are now 5 days past the first reading.
I believe the "banned in commission of a crime" list was already in effect when the DC sniper's happened. I would have to go back and look at the legislative history to be sure.
dblas,
Not sure how either scenario makes a difference. If I read it wrong and parts are already in effect like as far back as DC sniper, my point is that SNIPING is already illegal, WTF does it matter what type ammo is used? WHY do they single out lead, depleted uranium etc?
My point was that faulty "logic" in the wording of the legislation still strikes me as idiotic and criminal in itself on the part of the law makers.
I was attempting to convey that the wording seems to totally NOT make sense, especially in 2 regards.
One, how does inclusion of language where commission of a violent crime is included, correlate to significantly adverse impact on the health of wildlife from the usage of lead based projectiles?
Two,
Even if this language is in effect from long ago, my point is that these jackazz legislators are using language that amounts to using a sledge hammer to do brain surgery. In other words. Why the hell is there a Statute, with the subset "B" at all, that uses language excluding the use of lead based bullets while committing a violent crime? Shouldn't the 1000's of laws that state that VIOLENT CRIMES are already illegal and are CRIMES, be enough of a precedent to convict criminals who do violent crimes? What difference does it make to add a whole other stipulation about what type bullet one uses to commit a murder, a mass murder, a hijacking, a murder suicide, etc? Does anyone see my point?
In other words, WTF does it matter if you use a cop killer round or a poison dart, or a lead spitzer to kill someone? You get a pass if you use environmentally friendly ammo?
I'm so confused, I thought lead was naturally occurring in the environment, since it comes from the earth.This is something that people have talked about for years.
1. All ammo with lead is bad for the environment and must be banned.
2. All ammo made with metals harder than lead is "armor piercing" and must be banned.
This legislation comes straight from the anti-hunting groups,, the senator is just a proxy.Surprise surprise. The Bill’s author’s first name is Karen.
And why has Maryland Shall Issue not taken a stance on this? I get that it’s a hunting issue primarily but it’s also a back door attempt to ban all lead ammunition. Very disappointed with MSI that their website lists this bill as “information only/ no position”.
And also, this filthy Dem isn’t doing her due diligence. No carve out for LEO, DNR, and other Govt sharpshooters that I can see.