delaware_export
Ultimate Member
- Apr 10, 2018
- 3,276
The ball is rolling. Per fpc twitter link
This is as it should be.I wish we could just get a good SCOTUS case the challenges permitting period. Maybe we can atleast force states to honor eachothers permits. You know like they do with drivers license's they so often like to compare gun permits to
But at least DE has reciprocity.CA won't issue permits to non residents? If so then DE needs this treatment too.
Unlicensed open carry would probably undercut that, also DE has reciprocity and recognizes permits where the holder is a non-resident. Probably wouldn't be the best place for a lawsuit.But at least DE has reciprocity.
I wonder if some Texans who wanted to CCW in Oregon would be able to demonstrate nexus in 5CA, so they could sue there rather than 9CA? There's no point filing suit in 9CA; the outcome would be predetermined.Unlicensed open carry would probably undercut that, also DE has reciprocity and recognizes permits where the holder is a non-resident. Probably wouldn't be the best place for a lawsuit.
In addition to the places mentioned above, Oregon has some towns with open carry bans, and they don't issue non-resident CCWs to anyone not a resident of a bordering state. So that would be another possibility.
I suppose if someone were challenging nationwide we could get a plaintiff that travels all over the place for work for example and is paying thousands in license and redundant training fees to maintain a wallet full of CCWs.
I don't think so. They could file in OR state court as a potential option. But if we wanted this to go back to SCOTUS, it would require a loss somewhere in all likelihood to create a circuit split.I wonder if some Texans who wanted to CCW in Oregon would be able to demonstrate nexus in 5CA, so they could sue there rather than 9CA? There's no point filing suit in 9CA; the outcome would be predetermined.
In order to have a split, we'd need a clear appellate win somewhere, wouldn't we? None of the states in the 2A-friendly appellate diatricts would pass any of these sorts of laws for us to challenge.I don't think so. They could file in OR state court as a potential option. But if we wanted this to go back to SCOTUS, it would require a loss somewhere in all likelihood to create a circuit split.
The main problem with CA9 is they take forever, not to mention if the 3 judge panel actually ruled correctly you know it would go en banc and waste another year.
True but there are other circuits where, if you get the right plaintiff you would have a situation where they are effectively blocked from carrying.In order to have a split, we'd need a clear appellate win somewhere, wouldn't we? None of the states in the 2A-friendly appellate diatricts would pass any of these sorts of laws for us to challenge.