Search results

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!

    • Register Log in
    1. Apd09

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      For whatever reason he keeps banging the drum that it needs to IL cases taken up. I’m not sure why he feels those are better challenges. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    2. Apd09

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      Meh, pretty much nothing new. He spends a couple minutes quoting the brief, then the rest of the time explaining why it’s correct in its interpretation of Heller and Bruen, why the case should be taken up because the 4th CA played games, and that like Bruen this would be a 6-3 decision with...
    3. Apd09

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      Haven’t watched it yet but Mark Smith posted discussing the amicus briefs. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    4. Apd09

      NY ordered to answer to SCOTUS

      They’re not paying, the tax payers are. Which is why the state always has unlimited funds and wants to keep pushing for discovery and experts. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    5. Apd09

      NY ordered to answer to SCOTUS

      Even the justices the dissented in Bruen have to see the open insurrection of the inferior courts and be concerned with the rule of law not being followed. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    6. Apd09

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      I’ve done something with pictures. Showed a picture of an MP Ar 15 chambered in 5.56 and an MP chambered in 22lr and asked which one was a scary black rifle that should be banned. They couldn’t understand how they looked identical and one would be legal and one would not be. Sent from my...
    7. Apd09

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      It is too bad an attorney would probably be censured, held in contempt, and arrested for interrupting the rambling judge to first thank him for his service and then ask why that is relevant to an arms ban case. And each time the judge states it for the public protection to interrupt and say but...
    8. Apd09

      Victory in MSI HQL suit

      They just had the oral arguments a week ago. Dont expect anything for a long time. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    9. Apd09

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      Maybe 8-1 to give a single dissent to the opinion but stating the dissent in no way is encouraging the behavior of the “inferior courts” Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    10. Apd09

      Victory in MSI HQL suit

      The ending seemed bad. He got run over. And F that female judge that snapped her fingers at him saying “I’m over here”. That is so condescending and unprofessional to snap your fingers at someone that way. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    11. Apd09

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      It is 100% being remanded for more discovery on “common use” and what number is common. That’ll take years because they’ll spend a year finding numbers that support, filing briefs, rebuttals then scheduling oral arguments. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    12. Apd09

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      Listening now, but Mark Smith called it a farce and judges were garbage. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    13. Apd09

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      Our attorney needs to just say “it’s clear my points will not sway you and at this time we rest and look forward to the Supreme Court reviewing the transcripts” Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    14. Apd09

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      Bazookas and nuclear weapons are being debated. Unreal…. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    15. Apd09

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      These judges are refusing to listen and already made clear they get to ban. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    16. Apd09

      Cargill v Garland (5th Circuit Bump Stock Case)

      Interesting video about how Justice Brown Jackson might’ve spilled the beans that the Chevron doctrine is being overturned which obviously would impact this case. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    17. Apd09

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      No need to really sum it up. It’s his analysis of the brief file on our behalf. Basically the lawyers did it as they should, cited the proper cases, provided the proper analysis of precedent, and referenced a certain constitutional attorney with great hair who wrote an article about 2A...
    18. Apd09

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      At least he moved on from titles like “6-3 SCOTUS decision ends tyranny” Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    19. Apd09

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      After SCOTUS was called out in the State of the Union regarding Roe vs Wade I can imagine none of the justices are too thrilled with the current administration. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    20. Apd09

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      I would like to believe SCOTUS will respond in the most professional way possible saying “you would not need the extension if you didn’t take 14 months to issue a non response on a case, denied” Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Top Bottom