Search results

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!

    • Register Log in
    1. 7

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      Sorry but, Heller said no NFA stuff....Can't wait to see this place go up in flames when NYSRPA loses their case. District of Columbia v Heller, 554 U.S. 570(2008) "We therefore read Miller to say only that the Second Amendment does not protect those weapons not typically possessed by law...
    2. 7

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      Interesting, but your error is believing that all states did so do to criminal activity. In Arizona and Wyoming at least, the prohibitions on concealed carry were to protect the public from unseen weapons that could be used in the sudden heat of passion. Dano v. Collins, 802 P. 2d 1021 -...
    3. 7

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      Here's your COMPLETE post. Point out that opinion you quoted from. What justice Scalia was speaking about in the audio, was what he had written in Heller. You said 4 justices were needed to concur. I stated 4 justices did concur in the Heller decision. Therefore it's authoritative...
    4. 7

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      Heller clearly stated what weapons are protected. If you can't remember, go back and read the case, but don't include me in your imagined argument. Any discussion at orals beyond the specific denial of a permit to carry concealed firearms is just judicial commentary at its finest. They never had...
    5. 7

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      You missed the fact that 4 other justices did concur in Heller...DC v Heller was 5-4 in Heller's favor. Also, what Scalia spoke of, was exactly what he stated in Heller, as he was the author of that decision. I sure do understand what was said and I've quoted Scalia's statement many times...
    6. 7

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      No, I don't troll much. In fact, not at all. Some people just can't handle reality, can they. Specifically state what post I was a trolling or baiting as you put it.
    7. 7

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      https://rumble.com/vg6uhl-justice-scalia-said-concealed-carry-is-not-a-right.html That's exactly what he said. Exactly right, as today, New York decided that it wouldn't give concealed carry licenses to those wanting it for self-defense. And because concealed carry can be prohibited all...
    8. 7

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      Just what I thought, no license to carry a concealed firearm was sought in that case. Not sure how you think they're the same type of case, but they certainly are not.
    9. 7

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      You mean Justice Scalia took his own quote out of context in that audio recording?...I didn't know that was possible. Thanks for letting me know. Hey camo556, you calling me an " idiot " (quoting camo556), is definitely a misconduct on this forum. I never calling anyone here that, yet have...
    10. 7

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      Imao too...Talk about silliness. Especially so, when the author of Heller clearly states that prohibitions on carrying concealed firearms are lawful under the 2nd Amendment and state analogues.
    11. 7

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      Post up what he found to be unconstitutional. Also, who sought a concealed carry license in that case?
    12. 7

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      Not sure why you want to believe RKBA commentators, over sitting US Supreme Court justices that signed onto the Heller understanding of the right, but more power to ya. Are you calling this guy silly? https://rumble.com/vg6uhl-justice-scalia-said-concealed-carry-is-not-a-right.html
    13. 7

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      I would say your thought process is lacking, compared to 4 US Supreme Court justices that concurred on the Heller ruling, of which 3 are still sitting on the court. The 3 libs with Roberts and Alito, equals, NYSRPA losing..Though, it should be an 8-0 loss if not for legislating from the bench...
    14. 7

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      What I've proven is, what I had been saying about CCW not being a right, was 100% correct. And if you don't believe me STILL, go listen to Scalia again and again until it sinks in. https://rumble.com/vg6uhl-justice-scalia-said-concealed-carry-is-not-a-right.html
    15. 7

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      The time period from 2008 to now has no influence on determining the extent of a right. Sorry, that only works on corrupt judicial legislatures. As Justice Scalia stated in Heller and Justice Alito reaffirmed at NYSRPA v Bruen orals, the historical understanding of the right, is determined from...
    16. 7

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      There is no right to CCW, based on a majority of 19th-century courts to decide the matter...Justice Scalia, you know the guy that penned the Heller case, states just that. NYSRPA will lose their case. https://rumble.com/vg6uhl-justice-scalia-said-concealed-carry-is-not-a-right.html
    17. 7

      New York rifle and Pistol case: what's next?

      First of all, this case has nothing to do with carrying in the subway. It has nothing to do with carrying on a college campus. It has nothing to do with carrying in sensitive places. NONE of the plaintiffs were carrying in those places, and to be clear, the court won't address, ANY, of those...
    18. 7

      New York rifle and Pistol case: what's next?

      Well, why don't you go back and look at the pulled quoted words, not even my entire statements made, or previous statements made to support my postion and then look at the nonsensical comments made in response to what he decided to quote from me. Here, I'll give you a hand in following along...
    19. 7

      New York rifle and Pistol case: what's next?

      Why would Alito not go with what he said at NYSRPA v Bruen orals concerning the text, history and tradition of 2A rights? Which was just a reaffirmation of what they said in Heller in 2008...I mean, are you not following along or do you just not comprehend any of this?
    20. 7

      New York rifle and Pistol case: what's next?

      Why would they overturn Robertson v Baldwin, it had nothing to do with firearms. You really think they will overturn Roe v Wade?...Seriously? So, let me get this straight. You think, JUST, because they put a hold on Young v Hawaii, that they will rule for NYSRPA?...Maaan, that some pretty weak...
    Top Bottom