Search results

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!

    • Register Log in
    1. S

      Garland v VanDerStok SCOTUS Petition, Ghost Guns

      Official grant of cert notice: https://www.supremecourt.gov/qp/23-00852qp.pdf https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/24grantednotedlist.pdf
    2. S

      Challenges to ATF “Ghost Gun” Final Rule (ATF 2021R-05) Megathread

      Source: https://www.supremecourt.gov/qp/23-00852qp.pdf https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/24grantednotedlist.pdf Indeed it has.
    3. S

      Maryland bill will allow lawsuits against gun industry, but gun tax hike fails.

      It's yet another bloomburg promoted and lobbied piece of legislation that will do nothing and waste a bunch of time and money on frivolous suits. .
    4. S

      Cali judge tosses 1/month purchase limit

      SCOTUS involvement is ultimately going to be needed I think. This is another case with an obvious outcome but will take forever to get there.
    5. S

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      What are we placing the odds at for remand to district court vs. SCOTUS intervention (or some combination thereof)?
    6. S

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      2 more days until oral arguments in the 4th circuit.
    7. S

      Rifle purchase 18-21 year olds

      Yep 10 business days. Expect availability on March 20. Maybe the 19th if you get lucky.
    8. S

      Cali judge tosses 1/month purchase limit

      Great minds think a like. I just posted the same thing not 30 seconds after you did. I requested my thread be closed/merged here. Important excerpt: CourtListener Link...
    9. S

      Cali judge tosses 1/month purchase limit

      Important excerpt: CourtListener Link: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18759616/nguyen-v-becerra/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc FPC Link: https://www.firearmspolicy.org/nguyen Order...
    10. S

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      Correct I should have been more careful with the wording there. I knew what I meant to say and it didn't come out right.
    11. S

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      While I completely agree, this was also entirely expected. It would have been highly unusual for SCOTUS to deny the extension given they already (edit made here) had the chance to hear the case, but GVR'd it, and are now waiting for 4th circuit en banc to happen which just so happens to be...
    12. S

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      SCOTUS Docket 23-863 is also updated with a motion by Brown to delay the state's response by a month citing the en banc as a reason. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-863/302433/20240306154625010_2024-03-06%20Bianchi%20Letter%20to%20Court%20re%20Extension.pdf...
    13. S

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      Thanks you are awesome for that. Hopefully the groundwork is properly laid to back 4th circuit into a corner such that it results in a highly favorable SCOTUS opinion in the future.
    14. S

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      Can we get a summary of this for those who don't have 30 minutes to figure out what the actual meaning is? Mark is fine and all but his videos only have about 2 minutes of actual content and the rest is filler words.
    15. S

      We need this in Maryland. Liability of property owners that create gun free zones.

      I'd be fine with it. I'd rather just get a federal law making gun free zones unenforceable all together in spaces open to the public.
    16. S

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      The 4th Circuit seems to have misplaced their paperwork and will be working as hard they can to find it. :whack:
    17. S

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      Yup. In summary of case for those not following as closely: 4th Circuit En Banc hearing is March 20th Also while we are waiting, a petition for Writ of Certiorari (No. 23-863) has been filed with SCOTUS in attempt to force 4th Circuit to do something. The idea is that if 4th Circuit doesn't...
    18. S

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      *P90. Leave the S out of there. :gun7:
    19. S

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      You are correct. I have an email subscription to the docket, there haven't been any further updates.
    20. S

      Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

      FSTC-CW-07-03-70. Which is then superseded by ST-HB-07-03-74 and carries the same definition. Factually under the United States Army definition, AR-15s are not assault rifles. There is no pretending. There is evidence in text and throughout history of the development of select-fire weapons...
    Top Bottom