Fox123
Ultimate Member
Nor even a cold one.
We are already there....
Nor even a cold one.
It’s a smug question. How’d that work out in Afghanistan? Do you believe every Apache and A-10 pilot/crew will all be on the side of tyrants? Do you think soldiers will all be willing to shoot their neighbors?
We knew this when they went en banc in Peruta, to say there was no constitutional right for concealed carry.
Young was looking good until the 9th went en banc again. To say the same thing for open carry.
The SCOTUS will hopefully step in and say some form of carry is covered by the word "bear".
Because division of power is an illusion and they are all part of the same system.
Nice observation. Does that go against the 9th cir. rules of procedure?
I would file a lawsuit against every police dept because they obviously terrorize the public by the presence of their handguns.It remains as true today as it was centuries ago, that the mere presence of such
weapons [handguns] presents a terror to the public
The more I think about it, they simply rewrote Peruta and changed concealed weapons to simply any weapon. Now that they proclaimed that I would file a lawsuit against every police dept because they obviously terrorize the public by the presence of their handguns.
I went back and looked at Peruta. It is a little hard to follow, but it appears that the Court imposed this argument without the defendants really raising the issue.
So, you're saying the court itself stacked the deck against the plantiffs?
Nicely putMy simple thoughts go something like this.
The COTUS is the contract that gives the Govt any power at all. If the govt violates the COTUS, it terminates the contract, ends it own legitimate existence, and no one is morally obligated to obey it ever again.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
We are already there....
Sounds fine in theory. In practice, the GOV can just keep escalating force until they ultimately prevail. Have anything in your safe that works against an A-10 or Apache?
Not really.
Arguably, we have opposing view points. What has be lost is for each party to respect the view of the other.
We are not at the point where both parties see each other as enemies. We are approaching the point quickly, if society can't respect each other's opinions.
Not really.
Arguably, we have opposing view points. What has be lost is for each party to respect the view of the other.
We are not at the point where both parties see each other as enemies. We are approaching the point quickly, if society can't respect each other's opinions.