Chamblee at it again

Norton · Jul 7, 2020

Mentally deranged Andrea is back at it again. This time she clearly had someone write the letter for her because it's lucid, even if factually incorrect on nearly all fronts.

https://www.capitalgazette.com/opin...t3c3kWowZg8Yz83_WXV5MmSsOc-eiQWfTKIUb5IGcCmOI

Stoveman · Jul 7, 2020

Angrier Shamblee, the looney tune gift that keeps on giving.

Gee, I wonder who she is referring to here? :innocent0

It wasn’t a great bill. It had four pages of exemptions, many shoehorned in by the Senate to accommodate objections from We Will Not Comply objectors, an NRA-backed group who insist that they shouldn’t be responsible for loaning and selling guns to disqualified people.

And yes, the Patriot Picket is backed and fully funded by the NRA. We have lunch all the time with Wayne and the boys and sometimes help him pick out those cool suits.

I agree, someone else probably wrote it but it's definitely her words after hitting the Cardbordeaux.

Squaregrouper · Jul 7, 2020

I almost, clarifying almost, felt bad for her in Analpolis when she was uber grateful that I came to testify on her "expert" panel to stop long gun transfers and loans without background checks.
Once she realized I was not on her side, the psycho really showed through and I lost all of my almost sympathy for her.

Stoveman · Jul 7, 2020

squaregrouper said:
I almost, clarifying almost, felt bad for her in Analpolis when she was uber grateful that I came to testify on her "expert" panel to stop long gun transfers and loans without background checks.
Once she realized I was not on her side, the psycho really showed through and I lost all of my almost sympathy for her.

That was epic! :party29:

We are definitely living in this crazy bitch's head.

Bullfrog · Jul 7, 2020

I could buy a shotgun or rifle on that auction site for as low as $200 and have no background check

Wait, now there's an auction site loophole? Why am I just now hearing of this? :rolleyes:

The entire letter is a bunch of 'this is how I imagine it is' with no regard to reality. If this passes for lucid for her, I'm glad I've never read anything else she's written.

teratos · Jul 7, 2020

Norton said:
Mentally deranged Andrea is back at it again. This time she clearly had someone write the letter for her because it's lucid, even if factually incorrect on nearly all fronts.

https://www.capitalgazette.com/opin...t3c3kWowZg8Yz83_WXV5MmSsOc-eiQWfTKIUb5IGcCmOI

You are right about the factually incorrect part. Jesus, you would think these people would actually research a little before writing laws.

PowPow · Jul 7, 2020

Stoveman said:
That was epic!

We are definitely living in this crazy bitch's head.

!!!
Epic doesn't quite get there. The look she gave him at the moment of realization is worth a thousand epics, lined up one after the other. :party29:

Dingo3 · Jul 7, 2020

What a vacuous, ignorant, useful idiot tool of the left she is. Unhinged as well. Should she be “red-flagged” just to speak in public? It’s only fair

MigraineMan · Jul 7, 2020

Norton said:
Mentally deranged Andrea is back at it again.

Having met Angrier Shamblee in person, several times, I can say with confidence that those aren't her words. The Crapital Gazette is strongly suggesting that they are, but they lack ... abrasion. (the sand-in-your-shorts kind)

He keeps it unlocked even with his children home from school. He’ll brandish it at peaceful protesters. He’ll murder his co-workers, or his domestic partner and her children.

Who? Certainly not John.

Ammo Jon · Jul 7, 2020

The Gazette gives her a free platform to rage so she doesn’t look at the fact they are to blame for not protecting him and the others against a known threat. They should print the paper with the blood of the journalists that are on their hands.

Ammo Jon · Jul 7, 2020

Now it’ll be clear to know when she’s lying, when her mouth is moving. So many lies in that article, no credibility whatsoever.

Nickberg500 · Jul 7, 2020

Is it possible to rebuttal? Would they listen to us if we tore the article apart?

smokey · Jul 7, 2020

squaregrouper said:
I almost, clarifying almost, felt bad for her in Analpolis when she was uber grateful that I came to testify on her "expert" panel to stop long gun transfers and loans without background checks.
Once she realized I was not on her side, the psycho really showed through and I lost all of my almost sympathy for her.

This just makes me laugh and laugh and laugh every time I watch it. This surely belongs on the mdshooters hall of fame highlight reel.

RepublicOfFranklin · Jul 7, 2020

teratos said:
You are right about the factually incorrect part. Jesus, you would think these people would actually research a little before writing laws.

The problem is she doesn’t need to. As far as most capital readers are concerned she just spoke the gospel truth. Plus I’m willing to bet the majority of the GA has no idea what the laws are either.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Augie · Jul 8, 2020

The opinion piece is on The Capital’s Facebook page and comments are allowed if you want to light her up there.

fred2207 · Jul 8, 2020

Stoveman said:
That was epic!
We are definitely living in this crazy bitch's head.

Why yes, yes it was epic. Holding back laughter, I almost pissed myself. Can't wait for the next live episode...

hodgepodge · Jul 8, 2020

Oh, I thought about responding with a letter to the editor, but where to begin?

I want the auction site where she's auctioning off household goods but there's a section selling rifles and shotguns.
I want my FREE NRA knife if WWNC is backed by those folks. Does she know it's the other way around?
Our side was represented by young people seriously concerned about how their club would operate.

Oh, the entire article was like 10% true and 90% la-la land thinking.

OK, so I responded on Fbook.

HarryLogan · Jul 8, 2020

smokey0118 said:
This just makes me laugh and laugh and laugh every time I watch it. This surely belongs on the mdshooters hall of fame highlight reel.

THAT was incredible. Made my morning.

spoon059 · Jul 8, 2020

teratos said:
You are right about the factually incorrect part. Jesus, you would think these people would actually research a little before writing laws.

When your argument is purely emotion, facts aren't necessary. You can't debate emotions, you can only debate facts. They KNOW the facts aren't on their side, so they'd be foolish to use them!

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk

BeoBill · Jul 8, 2020

The anniversary of the murders was a couple of days ago, so the Sun (and it's property, the Crab Wrapper) HAD to beat the drum and unleash their pet emotionally damaged victim. I've been pointing out that the Sun is guilty of Criminal Negligence, in that they knew about the killer's intentions well enough in advance to take precautionary measures, but CHOSE not to. There could be some whopping big civil judgements for the next of kin if they wised up.

Chamblee at it again

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

NRA Endowment Member, Rifleman

TV Personality

Kragaphile

TV Personality

Ultimate Member

My hair is amazing

Where's the beef?

Ultimate Member

Defenestration Specialist

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

2A TEACHER

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Banned

Senior Member (Gold)

HarryLogan, also known as MesWoore

Ultimate Member

Crank in the Third Row

Users who are viewing this thread

Log in

Forum statistics