rob b
c@r collecting
I hope your right
but what will another AWB bring us
I think they do it so everyone will mob the shops and buy these guns that are to be banned and ammo for them
the ban makes no sense at all none
HR 6257
- Thread starter VNVGUNNER
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
I hope your right
but what will another AWB bring us
I think they do it so everyone will mob the shops and buy these guns that are to be banned and ammo for them
the ban makes no sense at all none
I was only correcting your comment.
To use strikeout: [noparse]xxxxx[/noparse]
I know, you and I are always joking about those labels....
Thanks for the heads up on the strikout...
rob b
c@r collecting
AKbythebay
Ultimate Member
Per the bill all firearms listed in appendix A are safe..
(3) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to--
`(A) any of the firearms, or replicas or duplicates of the firearms, specified in appendix A to this section, as such firearms were manufactured on October 1, 1993;
`(B) any firearm that--
`(i) is manually operated by bolt, pump, lever, or slide action;
`(ii) has been rendered permanently inoperable; or
`(iii) is an antique firearm;
`(C) any semiautomatic rifle that cannot accept a detachable magazine that holds more than 5 rounds of ammunition; or
`(D) any semiautomatic shotgun that cannot hold more than 5 rounds of ammunition in a fixed or detachable magazine.
(3) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to--
`(A) any of the firearms, or replicas or duplicates of the firearms, specified in appendix A to this section, as such firearms were manufactured on October 1, 1993;
`(B) any firearm that--
`(i) is manually operated by bolt, pump, lever, or slide action;
`(ii) has been rendered permanently inoperable; or
`(iii) is an antique firearm;
`(C) any semiautomatic rifle that cannot accept a detachable magazine that holds more than 5 rounds of ammunition; or
`(D) any semiautomatic shotgun that cannot hold more than 5 rounds of ammunition in a fixed or detachable magazine.
coinboy
Yeah, Sweet Lemonade.
[rant on]
This bill is bull honkey!
This thing needs to be DOA.
I like how the bill says how the SAW's had to be manufactured before 1993. Now that's going to be kinda hard to enforce, isn't it? It's like they copied the text from the old Executive Order and just added more crap to it. How much do you want to bet that if this garbarge did pass, either the guns listed will be the only ones legal for sale OR the listed guns will also be banned. We don't need new laws. We just have to enforce the ones we already have and right now we can't even do that properly! We will see this bill EVERY year until these people leave office or until it passes. That's all they are doing. Keep throwing things against the wall and hope for one to stick and one will eventually. That's how we are now stuck with the "Assault Pistol" ban in MD. These tyrants need to be removed from office.
[/rant off]
This bill is bull honkey!
This thing needs to be DOA.
I like how the bill says how the SAW's had to be manufactured before 1993. Now that's going to be kinda hard to enforce, isn't it? It's like they copied the text from the old Executive Order and just added more crap to it. How much do you want to bet that if this garbarge did pass, either the guns listed will be the only ones legal for sale OR the listed guns will also be banned. We don't need new laws. We just have to enforce the ones we already have and right now we can't even do that properly! We will see this bill EVERY year until these people leave office or until it passes. That's all they are doing. Keep throwing things against the wall and hope for one to stick and one will eventually. That's how we are now stuck with the "Assault Pistol" ban in MD. These tyrants need to be removed from office.
[/rant off]
The 94 ban didn't say anything about POSSESSION..... I need to finish my AK's and soon... Either that or I need to buy more .223....
SigMatt
Ultimate Member
(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to the possession or transfer of any semiautomatic assault weapon otherwise lawfully possessed under Federal law on the date of the enactment of this subsection.
You're grandfathered in, Numidian.
Matt
You're grandfathered in, Numidian.
Matt
Falkus
Dating Scarlett Johansson
"Oh, I Lost those in the boat accident"
if the ATF guy asked me where is my stuff ..
if the ATF guy asked me where is my stuff ..
Rattlesnake46319
Curmidget
SoMDGuy
Threadkiller Supreme
- Apr 26, 2008
- 709
They can ask, but I won't answer. They can search, but they won't find them. I won't lie, but neither will I cooperate. Saying more about this topic will probably upset Our Host.
alucard0822
For great Justice
Sent a letter to the RNC, and the NRA.
I pray the day never comes, but I made the decision a long time ago that if a confiscation bill passed, I would turn the bullets in first.
I pray the day never comes, but I made the decision a long time ago that if a confiscation bill passed, I would turn the bullets in first.
smokey
2A TEACHER
- Jan 31, 2008
- 31,524
what's the saying? "if it's time to bury them, it's really time to dig emm up?"
smores
Creepy-Ass Cracker
Check out the poll on the page linked in the first thread - 2% for, 98% against.
squirrels
Who cooks for you?
- Jan 25, 2008
- 4,021
Check out the poll on the page linked in the first thread - 2% for, 98% against.
When was the last time that "what the Internets think" carried any weight with politicians?
Internet polls and petitions are worthless in getting a point across. For one thing, people don't trust them because they're usually easily hacked. For another thing, people on the Internet are "weird".
Half-cocked
Senior Meatbag
- Mar 14, 2006
- 23,937
I pray the day never comes, but I made the decision a long time ago that if a confiscation bill passed, I would turn the bullets in first.
When you say things like that, they just move your name to the top of the list, you know...
alucard0822
For great Justice
When you say things like that, they just move your name to the top of the list, you know...
of course, however if everyone who belived it said it, and they knew what type of resistance and losses could be expected, they may be less inclined to do so. I hold the first ammendment in the same reguard as the second.
I love my country, and would sacrifice my life to defend it.
SoMDGuy
Threadkiller Supreme
- Apr 26, 2008
- 709
Not really. They know that most of it is just talk. The majority of people who make brave noises about resistance don't have a clear idea of what that would entail, and fewer still have the stomach for it. I'm not sure that I would, even if things got bad enough that an organized resistance got on its feet, and I know I don't want to be one of the "early adopters" who wind up being noble martyrs to the patriots and child-molesting, meth-cooking, skinheaded religious gun freaks to everyone else.
I know you do, and so do I, but there's a difference between sacrificing yourself and committing suicide. The first few hundred or few thousand or more patriots who stand up for themselves are going to die, plain and simple. The jabbuts will wall them off and kill them, and CNN will make it sound like a win for America.
Bury your goodies deep and wait.
Users who are viewing this thread
Latest posts
Forum statistics
Latest threads
-
Timonium Gun Show April 27-28 (Timonium Fairgrounds Exhibition Hall) (1 Viewer)
- Started by joro55
- Replies: 0
-
-
-
-
-
Convicted For Building Guns; Judge says, “Do not bring the Second Amendment into this courtroom”- Started by Harrys
- Replies: 1
-
