Doesn't someone need to be mentally competent in order to be criminally liable for their actions?
2021 feinstein awb
- Thread starter smokey
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
Doesn't someone need to be mentally competent in order to be criminally liable for their actions?
Allen brings up a point that has been floating in my brain.
Lately, Feinstein's mental competency has been questioned even by her own staffers, apparently. She makes Biden look alert and competent. I seriously think that she is a mental potato occupying an office built on her years of brand-name marketing and that people are drafting legislation and having her sign it, just as a Nigerian scammer would convince and elderly person to sign away their retirement checks.
I actually don't believe that this legislation came from her. It may not have even been written by anyone in her office.
Lately, Feinstein's mental competency has been questioned even by her own staffers, apparently. She makes Biden look alert and competent. I seriously think that she is a mental potato occupying an office built on her years of brand-name marketing and that people are drafting legislation and having her sign it, just as a Nigerian scammer would convince and elderly person to sign away their retirement checks.
I actually don't believe that this legislation came from her. It may not have even been written by anyone in her office.
MDShooter20850
Active Member
.
Last edited:
That's true of nearly all legislation. The senators and congressmen don't even take the time to read most bills.
I was just stunned that 8 Republicans defected and voted on HR-1446.
I really thought the RINO talk was vicious and unwarranted. Now, I'm not so sure. How the hell can you call yourself a conservative while voting for these bills?
fred55
Senior
Something like this BS passes I believe ~85% of political fund raising goes away. Not sure the politicians are ready for that. It’s a crap shoot what the courts, Supreme Court included, would do. We are certainly heading for a showdown. fred55
One or two folks are saying they need 60 votes in the Senate, don't they need only 51 votes to pass it?
I thought they needed 60/66 (2/3s majority) to override a veto?
It's been a while, and they may have passed legislation to change the requirements.
Q
I thought they needed 60/66 (2/3s majority) to override a veto?
It's been a while, and they may have passed legislation to change the requirements.
Q
smokey
2A TEACHER
- Jan 31, 2008
- 31,522
If they don't scrap the filibuster, then 60. Manchin is being pressured to join in voting to get rid of the filibuster and allow things to pass by simple majority. A lot of bad swings on machines resolve to not scrap the filibuster.
Who will be the Dem that is "on the fence"? I think useful information will be which one will be the most vulnerable to sign on to this and how can we make life difficult for that individual (donate to competition for the 2022 election). Be it competition from an R or another D in the primaries. I'm all in for paying protesters to lawfully picket these people. I can help fund that.
Assuming the Dems don’t suicidally kill the filibuster, the question isn’t which waffling D to target, it’s which ten or so invertebrate Rs to target. Because with the filibuster in place, the Ds need a fistful of ten Rs to make this happen.
- Nov 11, 2009
- 30,953
Long past time for some of these characters to swim with the fishes.
- May 29, 2017
- 7,743
Yes. She is kissing Michael Bloomberg azz or doing something extra to get his money.
gmoney_downtown
Member
- Jan 13, 2020
- 60
She's plenty competent, I don't know what you're talking about! See evidence: https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/article248666375.html
BrianS
Active Member
- Apr 26, 2010
- 427
They're feverishly taking notes in Annapolis on what to bestow upon us.
Nah. All Senate and House members are prodigious savers.
In the case of Feinstein, she has diligently saved her 174k Senate salary, each and every year for the past 345 years, to be able to amass her 60 million dollar net worth.
How about they do something really useful and expel Senators and Congressmen who had direct relationships with Chicom spies - examples: as their drivers, their Fang-Fangs, etc..
Users who are viewing this thread
Latest posts
-
3rd Circuit Case - Range v Atty General Non-Violent Misdemeanor as a Prohibitor (9 Viewers)
- Latest: KingClown
-
Montgomery County Gun Buyback: Interfaith GVP Network Aims to Hit $30,000 Goal by April 20 (7 Viewers)- Latest: Tower43
-
-
