brucaru
Active Member
- Sep 14, 2011
- 150
I identify as an “adult” should be good enough. Identifying as “whatever” seems good enough for everything else.
I'm confused. When the 9th struck down the mag capacity laws (for a whole week), there was a mad dash to legally ship them in. Cali had no choice.
Of course, MD would have to approve an HQL to someone younger. Gee, I thought MINE took forever.
Edit: dblas, above, while I typed answers this
Any military is exempt from the HQL though so they would be good to go.
I used to identify as an adult too, but the last 40 or 50 years have taught me otherwise.I identify as an “adult” should be good enough...
Under Maryland Law, they still must be 21 to purchase a handgun, so only military 21 or older would be exempt.
How do you know an 18 year old is?
I don't know, really. I don't think anyone does. I guess there could be a minimum age in my plan. 16, maybe? I know there are emancipated minors at that age. Perhaps 18 does make sense as a minimum as at that point most should have completed high school and, theoretically, should have the tools to lead productive lives.
The point was if the 21 years old is shot down, the military 18 year olds would be hql exempt.
Anyone know the status of the case? Is the government appealing en banc?
While most appeals for en banc need to happen within 14 days, the feds get 45. We need to wait until the end of the month or so to figure that out.
Then let’s push for actually preparing our children for that transition as soon as they are born instead of treating them as incompetent toddlers until they are 25 and beyond.
I'm puzzled as to why that is.
I mean, the preemption clause applies, Maryland is in that circuit, soooooo the federal law. is unconstitutional but the state law somehow is ok?
We seem to have bred and trained a large group of incompetent 20-something toddlers over the recent past. What to do about them, especially when they are being supported and encouraged in their behavior?
There's a lot to be undone, before we can get back to forward progress.
Isn’t the gun violence clap trap just a sad fig leaf for the politicians failed policies.
This case isn't dead yet, there's movement but I can't find all the briefs.
DOJ says the case is moot
Antigun states amicus supporting rehearing en banc
DOJ is playing the time game. Waiting for the plaintiffs to turn 21, then request the case be mooted.
That is wrong!
DOJ is playing the time game. Waiting for the plaintiffs to turn 21, then request the case be mooted.
That is wrong!
Another forum is reporting the case is vacated and ruled moot.
So, if this were an abortion case, brought by someone who was pregnant, the judicial system took 3 years to clear the case, would the court also moot/vacate the case? We moot because the issues was resolved by happenstance…
Maybe they have in the last, but I wouldn’t imaging it.