I think MD democrats will see this bill, as good common sense gun safety. I mean, if you aren't a bad guy, with bad intentions, why would you oppose it? What do you have to hide? It's for the children, think of the children. If you don't agree, you want dead children, and have blood on your hands.
I think the whole bill is a bit too much to try to shove down our throats, but being MD, they'll try to enact it piece by piece. I figured we still had a few years of mild freedom left, but the left controlling the senate, house and POTUS, I think they are power hungry and set on vengeance. As crazy as bill HR127 is, I think we'll see many more of these in the next 4 years. Similar, or multiple pieces of her bill, hoping some of it get thru. They'll claim it's not an infringement on your 2A, as long as a government psychologist, your spouse, former spouse and coworkers feel it is acceptable for you to have that right. But, it's not an infringement, lol. Neither is the poll tax, I mean safety fee of $800, that of course will only go towards gun safety programs. Think of bill HR127 as a movie trailer. The wildest, craziest parts of this show that they'll eventually show us. Again, this is all about control, NOT safety by any measure.
History has demonstrated that those whom th powers-that-be are colluded with will have no problems retaining their firearms. Good Nazis and those with solid political positioning were not required to turn in their guns, or were granted exceptions from the general registration and/or relinquishing to the govt.
Good Democrats will NOT be deprived of their guns; they will need them to protect thmselves from the Politically Disfavored.
.
How TF did this woman get elected? In Texas, no less.