Rep. Hudson to introduce Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Brooklyn

    I stand with John Locke.
    Jan 20, 2013
    13,095
    Plan D? Not worth the hassle.
    Respectfully, that phrase only became operative late on November 8, 2016. One day it will be November 8, 2024 and perhaps Elizabeth Warren or Chuck Shumer will be happily climbing the inaugural podium . . . and then what?

    Until we have certainty that the Federal government will (a) forever restrict themselves to the few specific actions identified in the Constitution, and (b) that those acts conform with Original Intent (c) and are interpreted as strictly as possible, I think we should be cautious whenever the Feds involve themselves in almost anything.

    Over 100 years to late. Meanwhile 14a.. changes the game and the scope of Federal power... Permently.


    Get over it.

    And to answer your question...Only con con can get us back to pre 14a.. or the repeal thereof.

    Your suggesting unlilateral disarmament...The left has been and will continue to use and abuse federal power.. while we bend over helpless.
     

    Brooklyn

    I stand with John Locke.
    Jan 20, 2013
    13,095
    Plan D? Not worth the hassle.
    There is also the argument that states have no right to prohibit OPEN carry, but that concealed carry is a privilege and may be subject to limitations. The position supporting OPEN carry as the core right, I think, grows stronger as time passes.

    Nonsense.. what's next...A core militia right...Oh .We done that one already :)

    It's just the next attempt by the left to gut the right.


    With luck they can get a few of us killed in the bargain.. it's been done before;)
     

    GlocksAndPatriots

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Aug 29, 2016
    763
    Except for Muchin, EVERY single Democrat voted against Sessions. That should put to rest the delusion that red state Democrats are going to vote for any major pro-gun bill. Unless the spineless GOP plays hardball and either a) goes nuclear or b) attaches gun bills to other must pass legislation, none of this is going anywhere.
     

    HordesOfKailas

    Still learning
    Feb 7, 2016
    2,205
    Utah
    Except for Muchin, EVERY single Democrat voted against Sessions. That should put to rest the delusion that red state Democrats are going to vote for any major pro-gun bill. Unless the spineless GOP plays hardball and either a) goes nuclear or b) attaches gun bills to other must pass legislation, none of this is going anywhere.

    From the Gorsuch omnibus thread:
    There are now (reportedly) 9 Dem Senators who will support a vote on Gorsuch. If true, that means Gorsuch will get confirmed.

    http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/444718/nine-senate-democrats-say-gorsuch-deserves-vote

    Might not be as dismal as you think, GaP.
     

    GlocksAndPatriots

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Aug 29, 2016
    763
    From the Gorsuch omnibus thread:


    Might not be as dismal as you think, GaP.

    Given that Schumer is in charge, there's no way he's going to clear any of his people to vote for the bill if there's any chance of it passing. It's not like with Gorsuch, because he knows the GOP will go nuclear if he blocks. McConnell is a spineless coward and won't go nuclear for legislation.
     

    Fox123

    Ultimate Member
    May 21, 2012
    3,931
    Rosedale, MD
    It's really not an important enough issue for them to waste any time or effort on.

    You look at their priorities and agenda, you don't see 2A on there.
     

    LostinNJ

    Member
    Dec 26, 2016
    19
    57 Senate Votes to Repeal Obama anti-Gun Rule

    Today, the Senate voted 57 to 43 to eliminate the regulation. Independent Sen. Angus King (ME) and Democratic Sens. Joe Donnelly (IN), Joe Manchin (WV), Jon Tester (MT) and Heidi Heitkamp (ND) voted with Republicans.

    https://bearingarms.com/beth-b/2017...rward-reinstating-gun-rights-social-security/

    https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2017/s66

    Well, 57 is close to 60. It's possible. Take Claire McCaskill of MO. She voted nay today. But she's up in 2018 and MO is CC state. Will be heavy pressure from her constituents to support the Reciprocity Act, in the face of heavy pressure from Chuck U. Schumer to oppose.
     

    LostinNJ

    Member
    Dec 26, 2016
    19
    PJ Media: Commerce Clause Will Now Bullet-Proof Concealed Carry Reciprocity

    After decades of dissipating the original meaning of the Commerce Clause, the U.S. Supreme Court went for broke in Scarborough v. United States. Scarborough held that there need only be a minor connection between firearms and interstate commerce—such as guns having once been shipped across state lines from the factory—for the firearms to be regulated forever afterward under the Commerce Clause.

    https://pjmedia.com/trending/2017/0...now-bullet-proof-concealed-carry-reciprocity/
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,427
    Messages
    7,281,313
    Members
    33,452
    Latest member
    J_Gunslinger

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom