Ohio Court Strikes Down Cincinnati’s Bump Stock Ban
https://www.tacticalshit.com/ohio-c...40250&utm_campaign=TS 11/26 News Master #Bump
https://www.tacticalshit.com/ohio-c...40250&utm_campaign=TS 11/26 News Master #Bump
Ohio Court Strikes Down Cincinnati’s Bump Stock Ban
- Thread starter TinCuda
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
pcfixer
Ultimate Member
Soo. from ATF website.
The Final Rule
The rule will go into effect March 26, 2019; 90 days from the date of publication in the Federal Register.
The final rule clarifies that the definition of “machinegun” in the Gun Control Act (GCA) and National Firearms Act (NFA) includes bump-stock-type devices, i.e., devices that allow a semiautomatic firearm to shoot more than one shot with a single pull of the trigger by harnessing the recoil energy of the semiautomatic firearm to which it is affixed so that the trigger resets and continues firing without additional physical manipulation of the trigger by the shooter.
The Final Rule
The rule will go into effect March 26, 2019; 90 days from the date of publication in the Federal Register.
The final rule clarifies that the definition of “machinegun” in the Gun Control Act (GCA) and National Firearms Act (NFA) includes bump-stock-type devices, i.e., devices that allow a semiautomatic firearm to shoot more than one shot with a single pull of the trigger by harnessing the recoil energy of the semiautomatic firearm to which it is affixed so that the trigger resets and continues firing without additional physical manipulation of the trigger by the shooter.
DaemonAssassin
Why should we Free BSD?
And with a normal AR trigger, their definition for a bump stock defies the laws of physics and the design of the AR trigger. Trigger has to reset, and therefore in order to fire another round, the shooter must manipulate the trigger again. Furthermore has anybody seen the contradiction that they made?
I posted this hoping someone would school me on it. I guess I will be forced to ask a dumb question...
Why does Ohio, at a state level care? Can this somehow overrule what the ATF says? Is this treated somehow like marijuana in that it can be illegal federally but not enforced if the state says it's OK?
Why does Ohio, at a state level care? Can this somehow overrule what the ATF says? Is this treated somehow like marijuana in that it can be illegal federally but not enforced if the state says it's OK?
I think it is like MJ. Folks in DC were openly selling it and DC wasn't busting people. Jeff Sessions sent in the fed's and those folks got arrested.
jcutonilli
Ultimate Member
- Mar 28, 2013
- 2,474
The issue was whether a local government could enact certain restrictions on firearms. The court said that the state law prohibited these local restrictions. This case had nothing to do with the ATF restrictions on bump stocks.
Users who are viewing this thread
Latest posts
Forum statistics
Latest threads
-
-
-
(Duplicate - mods please close) MoCo trans student arrested for threatening school (1 Viewer)- Started by Lafayette
- Replies: 2
-
-
-
-
