Conversion cylinders

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Archeryrob

    Undecided on a great many things
    Mar 7, 2013
    3,086
    Washington Co. - Fairplay
    Who is using them and which type did you get and share your experience with them. I have 2 Pietta 1858's and one is bras and one is steel. Obviously the brass stays as cap and ball. I was thinking of buying a conversion cylinder for the steel one.

    I was looking at Taylor's and companies model and didn't understand the different between the two except people will pay more for fluted?? Wouldn't non-fluted be stronger?

    Is there some other one you like?

    OR would I be better off just using my HQL and buying an 1873 and be done with it?
     

    John from MD

    American Patriot
    MDS Supporter
    May 12, 2005
    22,906
    Socialist State of Maryland
    I have both Taylors' and Howell. They are the same spec but Howell licensed some manufacturing to Taylor some time ago. The reason people pay more for fluted is for looks. As for strength, if you stay with under 1000fps, you will be ok. I use 6 grains of Bullsey, 6.3 grains of Red Dot or 8 grains of Unique in my Remington and Colt cylinders. These loads were worked up for accuracy at 20 yards and that is where they wound up. I can make one ragged hole at 20 yards benched with the conversion cylinders. I have them in .45 Colt, 38special and .45 ACP. All dropped in and worked without any work needed on the guns. A couple of guys at my club said they had to file the top of the hand a little to get theirs to work but the cap and ball cylinder still worked afterwards.

    The work that made the most difference in accuracy in my revolvers was putting an 11 degree lead on the forcing cone. I did this to stop them one of them spitting lead and, when I saw how much better it shot, I did it to all of them.

    They are made of 4130 steel so they are pretty solid.
     

    toppkatt

    Ultimate Member
    Apr 22, 2017
    1,197
    I have the Howell and the Kirst conversion cylinders. The Kirst is different from the Howell in that it has only one firing pin at the 12 o'clock position. While multiple firing pins aren't necessary, should something happen to the one pin then the cylinder would be useless while the Howell will continue to fire the other positions without problem.
     

    BeoBill

    Crank in the Third Row
    MDS Supporter
    Oct 3, 2013
    27,166
    南馬里蘭州鮑伊
    This is where I am kind of at. Is if even worth bothering with, or should I just buy an 1873?

    I like the idea, but dropping $250 on a cylinder when $500+ might get me an 1873.

    I use a Howell in 45 ACP. Works fine with Remington factory rounds.

    Having a converter is like having two pistols.
     

    jt2100r

    Active Member
    Aug 2, 2014
    217
    Huntingtown
    I have an 1863 coming in to Taylors when and if with the conversion cylinder> Its only a 31 or 32 cal but it should be fun.Taylors said they would check it in the gun and do what needs to be done if anything.
     

    Mike OTDP

    Ultimate Member
    Feb 12, 2008
    3,324
    I never seen the point of a conversion cylinder. If you want a SAA copy, buy one. The great advantage of a percussion revolver is that you don't have to bother with cartridges.
     

    John from MD

    American Patriot
    MDS Supporter
    May 12, 2005
    22,906
    Socialist State of Maryland
    I have both Taylors' and Howell. They are the same spec but Howell licensed some manufacturing to Taylor some time ago. The reason people pay more for fluted is for looks. As for strength, if you stay with under 1000fps, you will be ok. I use 6 grains of Bullsey, 6.3 grains of Red Dot or 8 grains of Unique in my Remington and Colt cylinders. These loads were worked up for accuracy at 20 yards and that is where they wound up. I can make one ragged hole at 20 yards benched with the conversion cylinders. I have them in .45 Colt, 38special and .45 ACP. All dropped in and worked without any work needed on the guns. A couple of guys at my club said they had to file the top of the hand a little to get theirs to work but the cap and ball cylinder still worked afterwards.

    The work that made the most difference in accuracy in my revolvers was putting an 11 degree lead on the forcing cone. I did this to stop them one of them spitting lead and, when I saw how much better it shot, I did it to all of them.

    They are made of 4130 steel so they are pretty solid.

    I'm interested in the 38 special conversion. I looked into it a few years ago. What pistol do you have a 38 special conversion cylinder on? All the info I found was that the closest I could get would be a 36 caliber and the .357 bullets wouldn't be very accurate because of the size difference between .357 and .360 bullets..
     

    Archeryrob

    Undecided on a great many things
    Mar 7, 2013
    3,086
    Washington Co. - Fairplay
    Look around, you may be able to find one with six holes. My 1858 conversion cylinder has six holes. I think they make the five holers for the cowboy action shooters.

    I saw one the other day, that was 6 shots and had the center stop for the hammer between all firing pins. It was only in Stainless and would rather have blued to match the gun. Now I can't find it again.
     

    Archeryrob

    Undecided on a great many things
    Mar 7, 2013
    3,086
    Washington Co. - Fairplay

    John from MD

    American Patriot
    MDS Supporter
    May 12, 2005
    22,906
    Socialist State of Maryland
    I don't care about 5 vs 6 shots. I like being able to Hammer stop between all rounds, instead of just the empty chamber.

    45LC is good, I only thought 45acp as it might be cheaper but that is only in modern ammo and not low pressure cowboy ammo.

    This one
    https://www.oldsouthfirearms.com/howellconversions-1858remingtonpietta45cal5shotlc.aspx

    Maybe I'll buy a sherrif model next year in steel and get the Kirst Konverter for it.

    Assuming that someone has them in stock next year. :rolleyes:
     

    Biggfoot44

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 2, 2009
    33,137
    Kenny Howell designed and pattented the specific design of a Six Shot Remington .45 Colt conversion cylinder . Subsequently he sold an exclusive license to Taylors , and he can't make them himself .


    What is your primary goal ? Do you primarily want a ctg firing SA revolver ? Or do you want a converted C&B on purpose ? Ie , get more or less equal enjoyment from each format , or recreating transitional design for either historical reenactment , or otherwise exploring the technology of the time period .
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,397
    Messages
    7,280,002
    Members
    33,445
    Latest member
    ESM07

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom