I currently run a a SIG Romeo8H with a Trijicon 3X magnifier on my 9" BCM SBR chambered in 300 BLK. The rifle is zeroed at 50 yards with supersonic ammunition and is always shot suppressed. Its primary purpose is for home defense. However, I do like to shoot subsonics (of course) and the Romoe8H is great because its quad reticle helps with holdovers at beyond height over bore distances. I typically don't shoot subs beyond 100 yards unless I'm plinking with friends.
However, I've been thinking about getting an LPVO instead. I figure that with training, a scope can be as quick as a red dot for target acquisition, the magnification would obviously be better for target ID, and a scope would eliminate additional parallax concerns for looking behind a magnifier through a reflex site.
Has anyone opted for an LPVO over a red dot under these circumstances, and if so, what did you go with? Im particularly interested in reticle choices.
Thanks.
However, I've been thinking about getting an LPVO instead. I figure that with training, a scope can be as quick as a red dot for target acquisition, the magnification would obviously be better for target ID, and a scope would eliminate additional parallax concerns for looking behind a magnifier through a reflex site.
Has anyone opted for an LPVO over a red dot under these circumstances, and if so, what did you go with? Im particularly interested in reticle choices.
Thanks.