Tax Stamp Price Increase

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • vwluv10338

    Active Member
    Jan 13, 2009
    393
    I had read about this bill but missed this point until now.


    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...o-tax-gun-owners-with-new-bill/#ixzz2d7OULoNf

    A pair of Democratic lawmakers are proposing steep new taxes on handguns and ammunition, and tying the revenues to programs aimed at preventing gun violence.

    Called the “Gun Violence Prevention and Safe Communities Act," the bill sponsored by William Pascrell, D-N.J., and Danny Davis, D-Ill., would nearly double the current 11 percent tax on handguns, while raising the levy on bullets and cartridges from 11 percent to 50 percent.

    "This bill represents a major investment in the protection of our children and our communities, and reflects the long-term societal costs of gun and ammunition purchases in our country,” Pascrell said.

    The lawmakers say the bill would generate $600 million per year, which would be used to fund law-enforcement and gun violence prevention.

    Critics predicted defeat for the measure.

    “What the anti-gun interests can’t ban, they want to tax it out of existence,” Alan Gottlieb, chairman for the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, told FoxNews.com. “It’s nothing more than confiscatory taxation.

    “I doubt this bill will pass, but we will lobby against it if need be,” he added. “This is simply another shot against gun owners in this country.”

    The bill would exempt all federal, state and local agencies, including police departments, from paying the tax.

    The bill would also increase the transfer tax on all weapons (except antique guns) covered under the National Firearms Act (which excludes most common guns) from $200 to $500 and index to inflation and increase the transfer tax for any other weapon from $5 to $100.

    The amendment will be voted upon when the House returns for the new session in the fall.

    Davis, who represents a portion of Chicago which has been ravaged by gun violence in recent years, said money raised from the new taxes will go to good use.

    "This legislation is a pro-active approach to reducing gun violence by using proven preventive programs which have been starved for funds until now," Davis said. "As part of a comprehensive, multidimensional strategy to reduce gun violence, this legislation closes major loopholes in tax law and lays out an equitable, long term, sustainable strategy to provide the requisite resources.”



    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...o-tax-gun-owners-with-new-bill/#ixzz2d7OULoNf
     

    llkoolkeg

    Hairy Flaccid Member
    It is lawful target shooters and hunters who will be screwed once again. Thugs only need enough bullets to murder or intimidate someone with but folks who actually practice and learn to hit their targets instead of bystanders are the ones who get to pay vastly more into the Democratic income redistribution/vote purchase pool. Miserable effers...
     

    -Z/28-

    I wanna go fast
    Dec 6, 2011
    10,661
    Harford Co
    Sounds like a poll tax to me. Perhaps someone in a freer state should file suit against the fed gov't on the grounds that the current tax is already unconstitutional. (Taxing a constitutional right)
     

    jonnyl

    Ultimate Member
    Sep 23, 2009
    5,969
    Frederick
    hmm, seems unconstitutional to my untrained ears.... I guess it didn't occur to them or they wouldn't have proposed it...
     

    hyjinx9

    Member
    May 24, 2013
    73
    I don't think they care if its unconstitutional they're just going to throw every think they can think of at the wall and see what sticks from taxes to banning weapons. instead of punishing respectful gun owners let's punish the criminals not just a slap on the wrist they usually get.
     

    IMBLITZVT

    Ultimate Member
    Apr 20, 2009
    3,799
    Catonsville, MD
    hmm, seems unconstitutional to my untrained ears.... I guess it didn't occur to them or they wouldn't have proposed it...

    Its less unconstitutional than it was. In 1934 the $200 was equal to a ban on these items. Now its just an expensive tax.

    I don't see this going anywhere but you never know!
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,626
    Messages
    7,288,873
    Members
    33,489
    Latest member
    Nelsonbencasey

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom