delaware_export
Ultimate Member
- Apr 10, 2018
- 3,275
Appeal will surely follow in 5..4..3..
Defendants have not met their burden of producing a “well-established and
representative historical analogue” to the OGM [One Gun a Month] law.
The Court therefore concludes that Plaintiffs are entitled to summary
judgment as to the constitutionality of the OGM law under the Second Amendment
Defendants have not met their burden of producing a “well-established and
representative historical analogue” to the OGM [One Gun a Month] law.
The Court therefore concludes that Plaintiffs are entitled to summary
judgment as to the constitutionality of the OGM law under the Second Amendment
And they’ll request a stay.
And it will be granted.
As predictable as my morning constitutional and equally shitty.
Stayed pending appeal in the original order.
As predictable as my morning constitutional and equally shitty.
SCOTUS involvement is ultimately going to be needed I think. This is another case with an obvious outcome but will take forever to get there.Appeal filed as noted. Request to Stay pending appeal filed today.
knowing the 9th, granted in 5..4..3..