dev
Ultimate Member
- Apr 4, 2011
- 1,361
Please weigh your buffer.
A little history:
I was part of the Spikes lower GB April of last year along with the PSA lower build kit. I then purchased a Spikes upper before receiving the lower which at the time Spikes provided their most talked about Tungsten powered filled ST-T2 buffer.
The issue:
As I got into the hobby of AR's my interest grew and I gained a good bit of knowledge of the functioning as well as judging many other peoples ARs against mine of different builds and configuration which led me to the issue of proper timing.
In a nut shell I noticed that my brass is being thrown forward at 1-2 o'clock rather then the ideal 3-4 o'clock position and my recoil is a bit harsher then some of the other mid lengths in my configuration. I also noticed that the inner corner closest to the ejection port of my brass deflector was taking all off the abuse rather then the body of the deflector.
So after gaining a better understanding I came to the conclusion that I'm over gassed because of an out of spec gas port on the barrel but then I read on some other forums that some of the other Spikes and BCMs that are using the same buffer was exhibiting the same feature and the rational by some is so when you fire cheaper less hot ammo the gun will cycle. Needless to say that did not sit well with me so I ordered the heavy Spikes T3 buffer which I have yet to receive with the sliding weighs as some people said it corrected the issue.
I then taken a good look at various listed buffer weights.
PSA lower parts kit buffer --- 3 ounces
Spikes ST-T1 ------- 3 ounces
Spikes ST-T2 ------- 4.2 ounces
Spikes ST-T3 ------- 5.4 ounces
Out of curiosity I weighed my PSA buffer and then decided to take out the Spikes T2 buffer from my rifle because Spikes said the weight can vary by .2 ounces, then I found the problem.
Here is the PSA buffer that came with my lower build kit.
I guess it varied + or - 1oz which is unacceptable and it might have been that the powder filled was intended for the T1.
I'm not worried and actually relieved that I found the problem which can be easily corrected with the right buffer however I did noticed from all my internet searches that some others using this buffer combo with the mid length have this issue and some don't and this could be the reason, so I thought that I should bring it to your attention.
Some may say it's a not a concern if the gun is cycling with no issues and I beg to differ especially since it appears it was not the intention of the manufacture to supply an under weighted buffer.
A little history:
I was part of the Spikes lower GB April of last year along with the PSA lower build kit. I then purchased a Spikes upper before receiving the lower which at the time Spikes provided their most talked about Tungsten powered filled ST-T2 buffer.
The issue:
As I got into the hobby of AR's my interest grew and I gained a good bit of knowledge of the functioning as well as judging many other peoples ARs against mine of different builds and configuration which led me to the issue of proper timing.
In a nut shell I noticed that my brass is being thrown forward at 1-2 o'clock rather then the ideal 3-4 o'clock position and my recoil is a bit harsher then some of the other mid lengths in my configuration. I also noticed that the inner corner closest to the ejection port of my brass deflector was taking all off the abuse rather then the body of the deflector.
So after gaining a better understanding I came to the conclusion that I'm over gassed because of an out of spec gas port on the barrel but then I read on some other forums that some of the other Spikes and BCMs that are using the same buffer was exhibiting the same feature and the rational by some is so when you fire cheaper less hot ammo the gun will cycle. Needless to say that did not sit well with me so I ordered the heavy Spikes T3 buffer which I have yet to receive with the sliding weighs as some people said it corrected the issue.
I then taken a good look at various listed buffer weights.
PSA lower parts kit buffer --- 3 ounces
Spikes ST-T1 ------- 3 ounces
Spikes ST-T2 ------- 4.2 ounces
Spikes ST-T3 ------- 5.4 ounces
Out of curiosity I weighed my PSA buffer and then decided to take out the Spikes T2 buffer from my rifle because Spikes said the weight can vary by .2 ounces, then I found the problem.
Here is the PSA buffer that came with my lower build kit.
I guess it varied + or - 1oz which is unacceptable and it might have been that the powder filled was intended for the T1.
I'm not worried and actually relieved that I found the problem which can be easily corrected with the right buffer however I did noticed from all my internet searches that some others using this buffer combo with the mid length have this issue and some don't and this could be the reason, so I thought that I should bring it to your attention.
Some may say it's a not a concern if the gun is cycling with no issues and I beg to differ especially since it appears it was not the intention of the manufacture to supply an under weighted buffer.
Last edited: