Federal Court rules law against making serialized gun unconstitutional

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • teratos

    My hair is amazing
    MDS Supporter
    Patriot Picket
    Jan 22, 2009
    59,952
    Bel Air
    Man. I wish I hadn’t thrown all my unserialized guns in the bay.
     

    Garet Jax

    Not ignored by gamer_jim
    MDS Supporter
    May 5, 2011
    6,820
    Bel Air
    We are in the time in US history where gun rights are going to change the most. The gov't has put us in a spot where we have to choose between having some reasonable restrictions or having carte blanche. Given the gov't is so unreasonable I am happy it is carte blanche.
     

    Tungsten

    Ultimate Member
    Jan 1, 2012
    7,324
    Elkridge, Leftistan
    I never understood why anyone complied with this before the absolute deadline to do so. It was bound to be challenged, and had a good chance of being overturned.
     

    Dogmeat

    Ultimate Member
    Apr 5, 2013
    4,659
    Montgomery County, MD
    Man. I wish I hadn’t thrown all my unserialized guns in the bay.

    They are mostly plastic, they will be OK.

    Where did you say you tossed them?

    OysterDiving.jpg
     

    Allen65

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Jun 29, 2013
    7,201
    Anne Arundel County
    I never understood why anyone complied with this before the absolute deadline to do so. It was bound to be challenged, and had a good chance of being overturned.
    The MD law still applies in MD unless and until the Feds appeal to 4CA, and 4CA upholds the District Court decision. Then it becomes binding precedent for all of 4CA, including MD. I doubt DoJ would appeal a loss at 4CA to SCOTUS, because that would go nowhere. OTOH, if we lose at 4CA, it'll end up back in SCOTUS's lap for more beatdown fun. But no matter which way it goes, it will probably be another year or two, or more, before it's final and MD's "Ghost Gun" law is effectively erased.
     

    Combloc

    Stop Negassing me!!!!!
    Nov 10, 2010
    7,294
    In a House
    We are in the time in US history where gun rights are going to change the most. The gov't has put us in a spot where we have to choose between having some reasonable restrictions or having carte blanche. Given the gov't is so unreasonable I am happy it is carte blanche.

    "shall not be infringed" means there are no such things as "reasonable restrictions". NEVER negotiate your Constitutional Rights away.
     
    Last edited:

    Garet Jax

    Not ignored by gamer_jim
    MDS Supporter
    May 5, 2011
    6,820
    Bel Air
    "shall not be infringed" means there are no such things as "reasonable restrictions". NEVER negotiate your Constitutional Rights away.

    That's just not true. Just like there are reasonable restrictions on the 1st, there can be some on the 2nd too.

    The problem is that people like Frosh aren't reasonable and so I have to choose between stupid restrictions and no restrictions. I choose no restrictions all day long.
     

    swinokur

    In a State of Bliss
    Patriot Picket
    Apr 15, 2009
    55,517
    Westminster USA
    That's just not true. Just like there are reasonable restrictions on the 1st, there can be some on the 2nd too.

    The problem is that people like Frosh aren't reasonable and so I have to choose between stupid restrictions and no restrictions. I choose no restrictions all day long.

    SCOTUS has stated “reasonable” is not unconstitutional.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
     

    P-12 Norm

    Why be normal?
    Sep 9, 2009
    1,718
    Bowie, MD
    We are in the time in US history where gun rights are going to change the most. The gov't has put us in a spot where we have to choose between having some reasonable restrictions or having carte blanche. Given the gov't is so unreasonable I am happy it is carte blanche.
    I am unsure what is actually a "reasonable" restriction, as any legal restriction is an infringement on a Constitutional right, and is not something that effects anyone but the law-abiding citizen, who is not the problem (unless of course, the politicians involved have a secondary and hidden agenda with said legislation that term "reasonable").
     

    swinokur

    In a State of Bliss
    Patriot Picket
    Apr 15, 2009
    55,517
    Westminster USA
    Trieste standing by…


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
     

    Attachments

    • 6FC12847-3070-459B-81B0-F86D424A8F8B.jpeg
      6FC12847-3070-459B-81B0-F86D424A8F8B.jpeg
      130 KB · Views: 79

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,953
    Messages
    7,302,096
    Members
    33,545
    Latest member
    guitarsit

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom