Gun "Use" definition -- question

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • john_bud

    Ultimate Member
    Sep 23, 2009
    2,045
    Hi,

    I was reading about a police Sargent in Milwaukee that had a ND in a shopping mall with his concealed duty gun (M&P 40).

    "A Milwaukee police sergeant whose gun went off inside Southridge Mall in Greendale on Nov. 2 was charged Thursday with endangering safety by use of a dangerous weapon, a misdemeanor.

    According to a criminal complaint released Thursday, Edwards was in line at Auntie Anne's pretzel shop when he reached into his back pocket for his wallet. As he did, his gun slid out of his waistband and down his pants. As he reached for the weapon, it went off, blowing a hole through his pants. The gun was not in a holster and did not have a safety, the complaint says."


    From the article

    http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/police-sergeant-charged-after-gun-goes-off-at-southridge-i83ca0c-135265738.html


    I understand that he was negligent for just sticking a loaded gun in his waistband, but when it slipped down his trousers and he grabbed for it -- was he "using" the gun at the time? Could he claim that he was protecting the public by trying to catch the falling gun and was not "using" it ?

    By the way, his department does not have a policy about officers offduty needing to use a holster. Guess they thought it was obvious.
    :sad20:
     

    Auckland

    Get On My Horse
    Apr 6, 2008
    1,540
    The Dena
    I guess its up there with shooting an intruder and being charged with "discharging a firearm within 100 yards of a dwelling". Prosecutors throw shit at the wall and sees what sticks.
     

    Jester1341

    Pro Judge
    Apr 22, 2010
    661
    Clear Spring, MD
    seems like a silly question, i agree we obviouslly wasnt using it, but at the same time i'm sure it warrants some sort of infraction for his neglagent 'handling'

    i hope some sort of safety class is required!

    not to rant too much but this is one of the things that gets me. no way he'll get in the kind of trouble a citizen would. same at cops talking on thier phone while driving, or speed exessively, or any number of other tihings that are fine for an officer or official to do or atleast get away with.......*breathe* okay i'm done

    john
     

    G O B

    Ultimate Member
    Nov 17, 2007
    1,940
    Cen TX
    You are responsible for EVERY round that you discharge. PERIOD. Discharging a gun in a crowded public place is criminal.
     

    Threeband

    The M1 Does My Talking
    Dec 30, 2006
    25,427
    Carroll County
    ...

    Could he claim that he was protecting the public by trying to catch the falling gun and was not "using" it ?

    ...


    There is no excuse for this.

    There is no excuse for a supposedly trained officer to carry Mexican, without a holster.

    "Trying to catch the falling gun" is the wrong thing to do. A modern pistol like the M&P is designed to be drop safe. It can be dropped repeatedly without "going off".

    --
     

    john_bud

    Ultimate Member
    Sep 23, 2009
    2,045
    I agree -- the officer was not rowing with both oars that day. Certainly negligence in several areas. Also agree that the DA is trying to make a point that ND's are "bad". But was struck by the word "use" and was wondering how that fit in with the legal system. I understand that words have precise meanings legally -- and I don't know this meaning !

    If the tin foil hat slips, I wonder if the DA chose this charge to send a message AND allow the officer to easily get off?
     

    steves1911

    Ultimate Member
    Dec 2, 2011
    3,057
    On a hill in Wv
    I would have never thought that an officer of the law would carry a gun without a holster. He obviously didnt pay attention while going through the academy and shouldnt be allowed to carry a gun ever again.
     

    marko12

    Senior Member
    Sep 28, 2009
    6,281
    Maryland, on the Chesapeake Bay
    There is no excuse for this.

    There is no excuse for a supposedly trained officer to carry Mexican, without a holster.

    "Trying to catch the falling gun" is the wrong thing to do. A modern pistol like the M&P is designed to be drop safe. It can be dropped repeatedly without "going off".

    --

    I think that this is a natural reaction trying to prevent an "Embarrassing Moment". Most would react the same way although knowing it is the wrong decision, after the fact unfortunately.
     

    Threeband

    The M1 Does My Talking
    Dec 30, 2006
    25,427
    Carroll County
    I think that this is a natural reaction trying to prevent an "Embarrassing Moment". Most would react the same way although knowing it is the wrong decision, after the fact unfortunately.

    Yup. That's the natural reaction.

    It's also the wrong reaction. If it falls, it's safest to let it drop (assuming a modern gun, and not a pre-recall Ruger).
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,957
    Messages
    7,302,318
    Members
    33,545
    Latest member
    guitarsit

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom