- Jan 31, 2009
- 3,289
"now that it's effectively gotten Judicial sign-off?"
No. Just the PI is denied. I don't think it's been ruled on its merits yet.
And I suspect Mark will move things to the next level now.
"now that it's effectively gotten Judicial sign-off?"
The Bloomberg/Soros team has probably been working on it for months.That WAS Fast for the Judge. 40 pages too.
Wow must be hell living in Md. I moved away in 74 to a red state. I can leave my house like right now its 4pm and have a new hand gun rifle etc by 5 and walking out if I go to the closest place and know what I want. My next purchase will be an AR sometime around Christmas when the prices are lower.Welcome to Montgomery County; trying hard to become the new Baltimore.
Increase Section 8 housing, defund the police, bring in more New Americans, and make the county a Gun-Free Zone. (And encourage bounties on SCOTUS justices; take two out and we'll reverse Bruen.)
Check out this section on churches:
Insanity.
Given this restriction, I'm thinking a number of people will become certified and "independent" Maryland Security Guards.
Actually, the judge did address multiple points which he determined would fail upon review.No. Just the PI is denied. I don't think it's been ruled on its merits yet.
It's being appealed to the Fourth Circuit:No. Just the PI is denied. I don't think it's been ruled on its merits yet.
And I suspect Mark will move things to the next level now.
Losing is as good as winning. Ok, not as good as we’d like. Either way it would be appealed. We all knew “sensitive places” was next element of jurisprudence to be explored. Welcome to the very cutting edge of law !
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It seems this Judge has effectively determined that Bruen, which does away with a "two-step interest balancing" test (Page 8 of the SCOTUS Ruling), does not apparently prohibit a "two-step interest balancing" test from being used when assessing a preliminary injunction.
I hope this is smacked down hard on appeal and soon.Outrageous
This year.When/ how did they slip that one by?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That’s really not how this works. It needs to go through the proper progression.And hence my comments that SCOTUS needs to get off their asses and do their job. It's obvious these local politicians are giving them the middle finger on their authority. Yet they sit back and do nothing.
As per your original plaint, the SCOTUS has "ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all federal court cases, and over state court cases that involve a point of U.S. Constitutional or federal law". That's their purview.And hence my comments that SCOTUS needs to get off their asses and do their job. It's obvious these local politicians are giving them the middle finger on their authority. Yet they sit back and do nothing.
I hope this is smacked down hard on appeal and soon.
I'm holding out what hope I can...Going to the 4th circuit, it’s doubtful
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And that's the crap that's causing all this erosion of the 2A. The Democrats know this and the poster that said Bruen isn't the magic bullet everyone is making it out to be is spot on.That’s really not how this works. It needs to go through the proper progression.
As per your original plaint, the SCOTUS has "ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all federal court cases, and over state court cases that involve a point of U.S. Constitutional or federal law". That's their purview.
They are doing their job.