shershot99
Active Member
Need the contributions to MSI to keep rolling in
100% yes!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Need the contributions to MSI to keep rolling in
A dialed back version means less to fight them over. Also little chance this gets resolved before enforcement begins. Courts as so. So not in my eyesWould it just be better at this point for the worst version of the bill to pass? For our court case I mean.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
this may help us as it will go back to the house and then have to be hashed out.MSI folks are indicating that Clippinger is going all in and amending all of the bills for the worse
I dont trust these courts... look at the MoCo Bill and the lack of decisionA dialed back version means less to fight them over. Also little chance this gets resolved before enforcement begins. Courts as so. So not in my eyes
a brave man dies but one deathAt the end of session last night, it was incredibly clear that none of the Senators understood the bill at all. But the ideology was clear: they need to pass something.
I love the idea of "EBMD" - but my concern would be that you could be carrying in a Home Depot, and some random red-shirt could call the cops on you and you get 90 days.
YepI dont trust these courts... look at the MoCo Bill and the lack of decision
I don't take it as an offense.a brave man dies but one death
a coward dies a thousand
No offense intended
I believe we are in full agreementI don't take it as an offense.
I've had my share of interactions with Maryland's bureaucracy. I'd rather trust my life to a random violent offender than the state.
"We have to pass it to know what's in it."At the end of session last night, it was incredibly clear that none of the Senators understood the bill at all. But the ideology was clear: they need to pass something.
I love the idea of "EBMD" - but my concern would be that you could be carrying in a Home Depot, and some random red-shirt could call the cops on you and you get 90 days.
This is worse than the ACA. The people who wrote this and sponsor it know what it does."We have to pass it to know what's in it."
Need a "Like" button.Anywhere ER carries.
You remain un-accursed.
The full House session is now concluding. The House Judiciary Committee vice-chair said a few minutes ago that the Judiciary Committee will meet immediately after the general session to discuss bills, and that a voting session is scheduled for tomorrow morning. I believe this means that the Judiciary Committee may not vote on SB-1 today. I'm not sure if they can pull a fast one and change this evening's Judiciary Committee meeting to a voting session or not, though. Just passing along what Delegate Moon said.The House Judiciary Committee did not yet vote on SB-1, and it looks like they have adjourned to attend a full house session that was supposed to start at 1:30 PM today. I believe the House Judiciary Committee will reconvene after that general session but I'm not sure at what time they will reconvene. I believe they will vote on SB-1 when they reconvene.
At the end Conaway said that permit holders expect to be able to carry as it was when they got their permit and if it pertained to him he would think this was a sham.
Now let's see how he votes.
Conaways last comment was great. But I don't understand how he can feel that way and still vote the way he has.
Maybe the Patriot Pickets have gotten through to Delegate Conaway who closed the session calling the bill a sham!
He's always been permitted to bloviate in committee hearings, but, like others in the D Caucus, he'll vote how he is told to vote by leadership.