Decision in Kolbe!

[the6thBook]

Get rid of the stupid law. So, I can go by a Ruger AR-556!

 

[rambling_one]

this is just another case of the nra attempting to take credit for something they really didn't have much to do with

You're kidding, right?

 

[teratos]

You're kidding, right?

Sadly I don't think so.

 

[Mr H]

Sadly I don't think so.

Some people only see what they want, others only what's under their nose, yet more only what they're told is so.

 

[DC-W]

We'll see...

View attachment 170315

 

[DC-W]

The two replies to his tweet are awesome



View attachment 170316

 

[Mr H]

That's got to be one of the saddest parts of all...

It has nothing to do with "safety"... or crime, for that matter

 

[md_rick_o]

two things:
It sounds like any military member should be able to justify the equal protection clause since they have significantly similar situations.

Then

(“[T]he ultimate decision for what constitutes the most effective means of defending one’s home, family, and property resides in individual citizens and not the government. . . . The extent of danger—real or imagined—that a citizen faces at home is a matter only that person can assess in full.”).

So this should also be usable for concealed carry

 

[jkeys]

So when this is eventually determined to be illegal and thrown out, can we all form a class action lawsuit for the monetary value of all the mags that dealers had to remove from our guns when we bought them?

 

[teratos]

So when this is eventually determined to be illegal and thrown out, can we all form a class action lawsuit for the monetary value of all the mags that dealers had to remove from our guns when we bought them?

Better yet, all the guns I had to buy before they were banned....

 

[Jim12]

Almost halfway through. So much win in there, but this struck me...

Dang. A common sense legal opinion that people can actually follow and understand. Unlike the convoluted, nonsensical statute that it eviscerates.

 

[Minuteman]

I found this funny:

http://captiongenerator.com/77728/Heir-Froshkaput-reacts-to-the-Kolbe-decision

 

[dlmarion]

Oh, yes, quite so as to the legal issues decided by the court.

It read as if the Federal Appeals Court handed the State of MD a turd pie and opened up possible other suits based on comments in the opinion. Such as this gem:

The right to keep and bear arms historically has been understood to encompass “self-defense and hunting,” Heller, 554 U.S. at 599, but Heller made clear “the central component of the Second Amendment right” is “individual self-defense,” McDonald, 561 U.S. at 767.

 

[JettaRed]

Get rid of the stupid law. So, I can go by a Ruger AR-556!

Is that banned? It's piston driven, not gas driven. You can't interchange parts with an AR-15.

 

[JettaRed]

Just saw this on the MSN homepage: http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/pe...eapons-court-rules/ar-BBp8GB2?ocid=spartanntp

 

[teratos]

Is that banned? It's piston driven, not gas driven. You can't interchange parts with an AR-15.

Piston is GTG.

 

[fred333]

Arrogance. Frosh is far from stupid.

He's a leftist. Leftist = willfully ignorant (i.e., stupid).

 

[Mr H]

I found this funny:

http://captiongenerator.com/77728/Heir-Froshkaput-reacts-to-the-Kolbe-decision

Missed a lot of chances, like the woman could have been telling the other, "It's OK, now we don't HAVE to buy HBARs"

 

[DC-W]

Is there anything else happening on the forum today? I wouldn't know. The awesome is too much in here

 

[ComeGet]

Still a ton of guests here.

Reading some of what King wrote, it's pretty apparent that he made his decisions based on his personal opinion about guns and not on the law. Shameful.