Mikebiker
Member
- Mar 16, 2009
- 16
Reasonable will be 50 to 75 dollars! Why should we be charged to sell our constitutionally protected private property.
Reasonable will be 50 to 75 dollars! Why should we be charged to sell our constitutionally protected private property.
Ron Young is one of the biggest liberals in the Senate and one of its worst members. Unbelievable he still has a job but that tells you how much Frederick County is now part of DC.
Absolutely agreed.
Beyond the merits of this bill (there are none), I understand FFLs are in business to make money. Do NICS checks cost them money now? I honestly have no idea. If not and if they are running an electronic check, I'd think at most you are talking half an hour max of one employees time to do the paperwork that the bill will require and run the check. Maybe I massively under estimate how much gunstore employees typically make, but it sounds like $15 or so to compensate them for their time and still probably make a couple of dollars for the store.
I get why many FFLs charge more for out of state transfers because they have to do a bit more work and handguns are even more with the 77r process.
We don't want FFLs logging anything in, or running any NICS checks, or logging anything out, or completing any transfers, or being happy that anything has passed.
We want our long guns left alone.
It's just more incremental gun grabbing.
PS: What's the name of the dealer/dealers? I'd like to confirm their joy.
I know millers in Delaware was pushing for this same kind of crap in delaware
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Folks are focusing on if/how 77Rs will be written, how much we'll have to pay FFLs for the transfers, and suggesting, strangely enough, that MSP can do the transfers if NICS/FBI won't be allowed by law.
Cart before the horse if you ask me. It's not even a law yet. And folks are already suffering from BGOS.
Maybe we should focus on killing this thing off before we focus on its implementation.
.02
folks here get mad at the hunters cause its all there fault when it appears to me to be one dude and his entourage, then we get mad at the LGS owner for needing to charge for stuff that the state may require. we stay mad at the MSP (and most of the time rightfully so) because they will have to enforce whatever law the MGA passes.
we eat our own. its what we do.
but in reality we need to be mad at the DEMS in the MGA and only them.
just my .02cents
TRUTH!!!
PS: Just scrolled through all fifteen pages. There are less than seventy MDS members involved in this thread. Out of how many thousands of members? This is too important a bill to have this little support/input/outrage.
Those MHC letters don't even qualify as good rants.
They had to be shamed into issuing those releases. I'm in awe of the secret squirrel plans.
Folks are focusing on if/how 77Rs will be written, how much we'll have to pay FFLs for the transfers, and suggesting, strangely enough, that MSP can do the transfers if NICS/FBI won't be allowed by law.
Cart before the horse if you ask me. It's not even a law yet. And folks are already suffering from BGOS.
Maybe we should focus on killing this thing off before we focus on its implementation.
.02
I've always been amazed by Republicans who hear a zany Democrat idea, but then instead of calling out the Leftist nut for advocating a stupid idea, focus their efforts on how to make the stupid idea work. STOP!
I've been worried about R's who sound like they want to fix -0-Care with a "replacement." The only "replacement" that they should be considering is how to foster a free marketplace with healthy competition and get the gov't out of it.
Why wouldn't the FFL log the gun in, run the nics, log it out to the new owner thus completeing the transfer. FFL will charge a fee and be happy this has passed. This is what I have heard from at least one dealer.