Please share, my work blocks streaming video.
.
Who was the plaintiff's attorney. She would be arguing more 2A cases.
The oral arguments went about as well as I expected. Both the attorneys and the judges were on video. Callahan asked the most questions. Lee and Lynn only asked a few. My previous assessment of how they are likely to vote does not change based on the questions that were asked, although there are surprises.
They are going to archive the argument on the court's website so you can watch from home if you wish. It should be up by tomorrow.
The former link posted is already live and available (just watched over the past hour).The oral arguments went about as well as I expected. Both the attorneys and the judges were on video. Callahan asked the most questions. Lee and Lynn only asked a few. My previous assessment of how they are likely to vote does not change based on the questions that were asked, although there are surprises.
They are going to archive the argument on the court's website so you can watch from home if you wish. It should be up by tomorrow.
The former link posted is already live and available (just watched over the past hour).
Thanks for the clarification!They just updated the link for tomorrow so the previous link will not work. The archived audio and video can be found here
https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/
They have posted the audio, for this case, for you to listen to already and will likely have the video available tomorrow.
Thanks for the clarification!
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
Review of the Oral Argument:
https://www.courthousenews.com/nint...al-about-california-ban-on-big-gun-magazines/
Imagine that.
Overturned en banc.
SCOTUS will deny cert.
Where have we seen this storyline before......
And of course we all know how this will play out since this has happened before, never mind that 9CA always seems to be the bastard child of appellate circuit and 95% time gets smacked down by SCOTUS. Geee am I being cyclical here noooo not meeeee