daggo66
Ultimate Member
Not sure why you're deliberately misinterpreting both the law and the intentions and moral compasses of your fellow members, here.
Sure, it says, "does not constitute" a transfer ... IF the borrowing party meets the qualifications needed to obtain a handgun. Which means having an HQL, until some fine day when that law gets scrapped. Pointing out the language and what it means isn't the same as defending the concept. Asserting otherwise is just picking a fight with people for no good reason at all.
Transfer has been defined here many times. In reference to the law it means ownership, not moving from one place to another or one person to another. If I handed you my gun to use I did not transfer it to you.