alucard0822
For great Justice
Without a specific case ruling, no, but it should. The only part of the document that is "living" are the ability to add additional amendments through the process described in the constitution. Thing is most other amendments aren't ignored to the degree the 2A is. The 1A "freedom of speech" clearly applies to emails as much as a quill and parchment, silly to think the 2A applies to muskets and not M16s.If I understand correctly, Bruen concludes that the 2nd Amendment must be read with it's words having the same meaning they had during the period the Amendment was passed. In the Second’s case, this was identified as being between the ratification of the 2nd (1791) and 14th (1868) Amendments.
Does that conclusion apply to the entire Constitution as well as it's other Amendments?