I'll just leave this here.
I do not intend to pull anyone's leg too hard .
Credits and Oscar nominees:
@SkiPatrolDude @Doctor_M @RoadDawg @gungate
Oh man, thank you for that. I just about wet myself laughing at that.
I'll just leave this here.
I do not intend to pull anyone's leg too hard .
Credits and Oscar nominees:
@SkiPatrolDude @Doctor_M @RoadDawg @gungate
Oh, I hear you as to why.
Broken windows theory - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Just pointing out, the broken window theory on enforcing minor crimes and community policing is still "controversial", but more because of some of the methods some police departments went to enforcing that. But the results on the other hand, aren't nearly as much in doubt. So change some of the methods, but the principle is the same.
Like why bro.Yeah, no brainer.
That won't stop a bunch of FUDDS on here from making the argument against it, though.
Only if the case is in Mississippi, Texas, or Louisiana (the 5th circuit). And even if it does go up to SCOTUS and applies elsewhere (not going to happen in the timeframe of Hunter Biden's charges/trial/whatever) doesn't change the fact that he knowingly lied on the federal paperwork.This opinion may help Hunter Biden's case.
Being anti drugs does NOT make one a FUDD. You have your opinion, I'll have mine.Yeah, no brainer.
That won't stop a bunch of FUDDS on here from making the argument against it, though.
A guy shooting smack, or guzzling grain alcohol shouldn't lose his 2A rights either.This is correct. Seems obvious, but a guy eating a gummy on Friday night to relax shouldn't lose his 2A rights on Sunday. To argue otherwise is arguing against common sense. Intoxication, however, is another matter.
We know who they are. Here in Maryland the law should be no different that owning a gun and possessing alcohol since both are now legalYeah, no brainer.
That won't stop a bunch of FUDDS on here from making the argument against it, though.
Are you anti alcohol?Being anti drugs does NOT make one a FUDD. You have your opinion, I'll have mine.
Sorry, I didn't mean to suggest that prior episodes of intoxication were a problem. Just public intoxication while carrying.A guy shooting smack, or guzzling grain alcohol shouldn't lose his 2A rights either.
I don't care if all three are knee-crawling, and commode hugging, or if they are sober as a judge
If they act like savages, they go to jail. When they get out (if ever), back to guns
Freedom can be ugly and dangerous
It's not Maryland's law we're talking about. It's not legal in the federal context. And it's the feds' paperwork that will still get you tripped up. Or not perhaps, now, but only in the three states where this ruling has any meaning. Here in Maryland? Nothing has changed. Dope is federally naughty, so no guns for people who use it, say the feds.We know who they are. Here in Maryland the law should be no different that owning a gun and possessing alcohol since both are now legal
I disagree with that tooSorry, I didn't mean to suggest that prior intoxication was a problem. Just that historically, we have regulated carry by a person while intoxicated, and I'm OK with that.
Yeah, but merely being intoxicated in public is an arrestable offense most places, so I don't think you're going to see any changes there.I disagree with that too
Drink, or sober, don't violate anyone else's rights/space, and carry away
Ugly freedom .....
You are very right about that.Yeah, but merely being intoxicated in public is an arrestable offense most places, so I don't think you're going to see any changes there.
Even if I were a full fledged Temperance person (I'm not) my point is it doesn't make me anti-gun or a Fudd.Are you anti alcohol?