US v. Rahimi (22-915)

[Inigoes]

Link to the Supreme Court Docket for the Rahimi case, as of this post there have been 39 amicus curiae briefs filed in support of the anti gunners. You can access them digitally from the Docket. The briefs supporting the 2nd Amendment should start showing up in about 30 days.

Link to Supreme Court case No. 22-915 United States v. Zackey Rahimi:

Search

This case will tear down the leftist's disarmament flagship post heller.

It is bound to whip them all into a tizzy.

 

[pcfixer]

This case will tear down the leftist's disarmament flagship post heller.

It is bound to whip them all into a tizzy.

Yes, this wil. Already see it. "39 amicus curiae briefs filed in support of the anti gunners"

 

[swinokur]

Orals scheduled by SCOTUS for Nov. 7

 

[Blacksmith101]

Bump to the top.

Because all the Amicus briefs in support of Rahimi are being filed.

Link to the Supreme Court Docket which has links to all the briefs, etc.:

Search

 

[Inigoes]

Orals scheduled by SCOTUS for Nov. 7

Bump

Two week warning

The left is in overdrive twisting due process into temporary restraining orders, instead of giving the accused their day in court.

Warning, antigun drivel below:

The Supreme Court confronts its own failure in an appalling case about guns

The justices are seriously considering whether domestic abusers have a right to own a gun.

www.vox.com

 

[krucam]

Bump, 2 DAY warning on Oral Arguments

 

[Bob A]

Bump

Two week warning

The left is in overdrive twisting due process into temporary restraining orders, instead of giving the accused their day in court.

Warning, antigun drivel below:

The Supreme Court confronts its own failure in an appalling case about guns

The justices are seriously considering whether domestic abusers have a right to own a gun.

www.vox.com

Some cute bits in the referenced article.

After attempting to destroy Kavanaugh's reputation with a phony allegation of rape, the Left is reduced to writing ledes like this:

Mr. Kavanaugh, tear down this precedent!​

The article also wants the Court to tear down Bruen, and bring back the two-step two step:

The most responsible course the Supreme Court could take, given Bruen’s many flaws, would be to overrule that decision in its entirety and announce a different, more workable framework that courts can apply in future Second Amendment cases — such as the two-step framework that was used by the courts of appeals before the Supreme Court made them abandon that framework in Bruen.

It's laughable.

 

[pcfixer]

Some cute bits in the referenced article.

After attempting to destroy Kavanaugh's reputation with a phony allegation of rape, the Left is reduced to writing ledes like this:

Mr. Kavanaugh, tear down this precedent!​

The article also wants the Court to tear down Bruen, and bring back the two-step two step:

The most responsible course the Supreme Court could take, given Bruen’s many flaws, would be to overrule that decision in its entirety and announce a different, more workable framework that courts can apply in future Second Amendment cases — such as the two-step framework that was used by the courts of appeals before the Supreme Court made them abandon that framework in Bruen.

It's laughable.

 

[Inigoes]

The question the SCOTUS is taking up in Rahimi:

Whether 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(8), which prohibits the possession of firearms by persons subject to domestic-violence restraining orders, violates the Second Amendment on its face

 

[Blacksmith101]

Our favorite long winded 2nd Amendment lawyer has a new video about Rahimi:

 

[coinboy]

Anyone know where we can listen to the case today?

 

[Inigoes]

Anyone know where we can listen to the case today?

www.supremecourt.gov

 

[pcfixer]

Today at the Court - Tuesday, Nov 7, 2023​

---

• The Court will convene for a public session in the Courtroom at 10 a.m. The Justices will hear one oral argument. An audio feed will be live-streamed, and the audio will be available on the Court's website later in the day.

 

[coinboy]

www.supremecourt.gov

Thank you

 

[pcfixer]

MSN

 

[Inigoes]

Oral argument audio is available

Oral Argument - Audio File

 

[pcfixer]

https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2023/22-915_6jgm.pdf

 

[coinboy]

What you all think?

 

[krucam]

SCOTUS didn’t take this to uphold CA5’s ruling which took down a Federal Statute.

Lefty read but a good take on the arguments today.

» The Supreme Court appears poised to rein in its worst decision on guns, in US v. Rahimi

About 40 minutes into Tuesday’s Supreme Court argument asking whether a federal law prohibiting domestic abusers from owning guns is unconstitutional, Chie

cherumbu.com

 

[Boxcab]

SCOTUS didn’t take this to uphold CA5’s ruling which took down a Federal Statute.

Lefty read but a good take on the arguments today.

» The Supreme Court appears poised to rein in its worst decision on guns, in US v. Rahimi

About 40 minutes into Tuesday’s Supreme Court argument asking whether a federal law prohibiting domestic abusers from owning guns is unconstitutional, Chie

cherumbu.com

Yeah, with an opening like this, it sounds like grasping at straws...

"The Supreme Court appears poised to rein in its worst decision on guns, in US v. Rahimi"

Me thinks they are hoping their words will influence the Judges.

.

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk