Ain't nobody got time for that.I was thinking I need Mark Smith to translate. ; )
Ain't nobody got time for that.I was thinking I need Mark Smith to translate. ; )
I have no idea what you just said.
The referenced 11th Circuit decision no longer good lawI have no idea what you just said.
thanksBack in March, a Florida state law was upheld that prohibited 18 to 20 year olds from purchasing firearms. An en banc review of that March decision was requested. That request for an en banc review (a request for a review of the March decision, this time by all judges) was granted in July.
Because en banc review was granted in July, but the pending review has yet to be held, he's saying that the March decision has no precedential value.
Well why didn't you say that?The referenced 11th Circuit decision no longer good law
Can't help it. I've been a lawyer/litigator far too long to speak normal English.thanks
Well why didn't you say that?
You just keep being your true authentic self and keep on winning!Can't help it. I've been a lawyer/litigator far too long to speak normal English.
My pleasure sir
If necessary I will hold your Johnson!
No surprise, .gov is requesting a stay on the injunction pending their appeal.
The unkind comments toward him is unwarranted. He is a good dude and I appreciate his work.