If you want to voice your opinion to those that are going to pass this abomination, you could go up to Annapolis on Man Up Mondays, or you can just compain about it here!!
If you want to voice your opinion to those that are going to pass this abomination, you could go up to Annapolis on Man Up Mondays, or you can just compain about it here!!
You may be interested to know that in 2010 Maryland expanded the Castle Doctrine to include immunity from civil lawsuits if the person reasonably believes that force or deadly force is necessary to repel an attack by the individual (in the home). 2010 Maryland Code COURTS AND JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS TITLE 5 - LIMITATIONS, PROHIBITED ACTIONS, AND IMMUNITIES Subtitle 8 - Immunities and Prohibited Actions - Miscellaneous Section 5-808 - Civil immunity for defense of dwelling or place of business. § 5-808 Civil immunity for defense of dwelling or place of business. (a) Person.- In this section, "person" does not include a governmental entity. (b) Civil immunity.- A person is not liable for damages for a personal injury or death of an individual who enters the person's dwelling or place of business if: (1) The person reasonably believes that force or deadly force is necessary to repel an attack by the individual; and (2) The amount and nature of the force used by the person is reasonable under the circumstances. (c) Exception.- Subsection (b) of this section does not apply to a person who is convicted of a crime of violence under § 14-101 of the Criminal Law Article, assault in the second degree, or reckless endangerment arising out of the circumstances described in subsection (b) of this section. (d) Costs and attorney's fees.- The court may award costs and reasonable attorney's fees to a defendant who prevails in a defense under this section. (e) Other provisions not limited or abrogated.- This section does not limit or abrogate any immunity from civil liability or defense available to a person under any other provision of the Code or at common law. [2010, ch. 555.] |
I would agree the politicians are evil, but the voters who put them there are stupid.Not stupid, just evil.
So how does one get damages from a multigenerational welfare recipient?
You may be interested to know that in 2010 Maryland expanded the Castle Doctrine to include immunity from civil lawsuits if the person reasonably believes that force or deadly force is necessary to repel an attack by the individual (in the home). 2010 Maryland Code COURTS AND JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS TITLE 5 - LIMITATIONS, PROHIBITED ACTIONS, AND IMMUNITIES Subtitle 8 - Immunities and Prohibited Actions - Miscellaneous Section 5-808 - Civil immunity for defense of dwelling or place of business. § 5-808 Civil immunity for defense of dwelling or place of business. (a) Person.- In this section, "person" does not include a governmental entity. (b) Civil immunity.- A person is not liable for damages for a personal injury or death of an individual who enters the person's dwelling or place of business if: (1) The person reasonably believes that force or deadly force is necessary to repel an attack by the individual; and (2) The amount and nature of the force used by the person is reasonable under the circumstances. (c) Exception.- Subsection (b) of this section does not apply to a person who is convicted of a crime of violence under § 14-101 of the Criminal Law Article, assault in the second degree, or reckless endangerment arising out of the circumstances described in subsection (b) of this section. (d) Costs and attorney's fees.- The court may award costs and reasonable attorney's fees to a defendant who prevails in a defense under this section. (e) Other provisions not limited or abrogated.- This section does not limit or abrogate any immunity from civil liability or defense available to a person under any other provision of the Code or at common law. [2010, ch. 555.]
And it's getting National level attention...I just checked the hearing schedule, this appears to be in front of two committees, or a joint committee (Judiciary and Economic Matter), and currently has no hearing date set.
Reinstitute the concept of Dickensian workhouses and debtors' prisons?So how does one get damages from a multigenerational welfare recipient?
Since when does that matter? Remember the whole fiasco over binary triggers? The people passing these laws are absolutely clueless and they don't care to be educated on the subject.If the report I heard last night was accurate, the type of insurance the bill calls for doesn't even exist.
Remember the microstamping fantasy? They pass laws that have no bearing on reality all the time. All in the name of "Doing something!".Since when does that matter? Remember the whole fiasco over binary triggers? The people passing these laws are absolutely clueless and they don't care to be educated on the subject.
Or tagents in powder!Remember the microstamping fantasy? They pass laws that have no bearing on reality all the time. All in the name of "Doing something!".
House Bill 0430 will require that every person who carries a loaded firearm but have a $300,000 liability policy. This is not limited to carry permit holders. It will impact hunters, trap shooters, casual shooters, 4H and Scouts. Even non-federal law enforcement officers will be subject to this requirement. OPPOSEI just checked the hearing schedule, this appears to be in front of two committees, or a joint committee (Judiciary and Economic Matter), and currently has no hearing date set.
MD considers ammo in a mag in a gun a loaded gun. You aren't getting off that easy.No requirement if gun is unloaded. Hmm….
Israeli carry +1.
A) unloaded gun with mag in pocketMD considers ammo in a mag in a gun a loaded gun. You aren't getting off that easy.
Can I have option B for $200 Alex?A) unloaded gun with mag in pocket
B) Fvck You MGA, WWNC