Recent content by 777GSOTB

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!

    • Register Log in
    1. 7

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      Sorry but, Heller said no NFA stuff....Can't wait to see this place go up in flames when NYSRPA loses their case. District of Columbia v Heller, 554 U.S. 570(2008) "We therefore read Miller to say only that the Second Amendment does not protect those weapons not typically possessed by law...
    2. 7

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      Interesting, but your error is believing that all states did so do to criminal activity. In Arizona and Wyoming at least, the prohibitions on concealed carry were to protect the public from unseen weapons that could be used in the sudden heat of passion. Dano v. Collins, 802 P. 2d 1021 -...
    3. 7

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      Here's your COMPLETE post. Point out that opinion you quoted from. What justice Scalia was speaking about in the audio, was what he had written in Heller. You said 4 justices were needed to concur. I stated 4 justices did concur in the Heller decision. Therefore it's authoritative...
    4. 7

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      Heller clearly stated what weapons are protected. If you can't remember, go back and read the case, but don't include me in your imagined argument. Any discussion at orals beyond the specific denial of a permit to carry concealed firearms is just judicial commentary at its finest. They never had...
    5. 7

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      You missed the fact that 4 other justices did concur in Heller...DC v Heller was 5-4 in Heller's favor. Also, what Scalia spoke of, was exactly what he stated in Heller, as he was the author of that decision. I sure do understand what was said and I've quoted Scalia's statement many times...
    6. 7

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      No, I don't troll much. In fact, not at all. Some people just can't handle reality, can they. Specifically state what post I was a trolling or baiting as you put it.
    7. 7

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      https://rumble.com/vg6uhl-justice-scalia-said-concealed-carry-is-not-a-right.html That's exactly what he said. Exactly right, as today, New York decided that it wouldn't give concealed carry licenses to those wanting it for self-defense. And because concealed carry can be prohibited all...
    8. 7

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      Just what I thought, no license to carry a concealed firearm was sought in that case. Not sure how you think they're the same type of case, but they certainly are not.
    9. 7

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      You mean Justice Scalia took his own quote out of context in that audio recording?...I didn't know that was possible. Thanks for letting me know. Hey camo556, you calling me an " idiot " (quoting camo556), is definitely a misconduct on this forum. I never calling anyone here that, yet have...
    10. 7

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      Imao too...Talk about silliness. Especially so, when the author of Heller clearly states that prohibitions on carrying concealed firearms are lawful under the 2nd Amendment and state analogues.
    11. 7

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      Post up what he found to be unconstitutional. Also, who sought a concealed carry license in that case?
    12. 7

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      Not sure why you want to believe RKBA commentators, over sitting US Supreme Court justices that signed onto the Heller understanding of the right, but more power to ya. Are you calling this guy silly? https://rumble.com/vg6uhl-justice-scalia-said-concealed-carry-is-not-a-right.html
    13. 7

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      I would say your thought process is lacking, compared to 4 US Supreme Court justices that concurred on the Heller ruling, of which 3 are still sitting on the court. The 3 libs with Roberts and Alito, equals, NYSRPA losing..Though, it should be an 8-0 loss if not for legislating from the bench...
    14. 7

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      What I've proven is, what I had been saying about CCW not being a right, was 100% correct. And if you don't believe me STILL, go listen to Scalia again and again until it sinks in. https://rumble.com/vg6uhl-justice-scalia-said-concealed-carry-is-not-a-right.html
    15. 7

      NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

      The time period from 2008 to now has no influence on determining the extent of a right. Sorry, that only works on corrupt judicial legislatures. As Justice Scalia stated in Heller and Justice Alito reaffirmed at NYSRPA v Bruen orals, the historical understanding of the right, is determined from...
    See more
    Top Bottom