For whatever reason he keeps banging the drum that it needs to IL cases taken up. I’m not sure why he feels those are better challenges.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Meh, pretty much nothing new. He spends a couple minutes quoting the brief, then the rest of the time explaining why it’s correct in its interpretation of Heller and Bruen, why the case should be taken up because the 4th CA played games, and that like Bruen this would be a 6-3 decision with...
They’re not paying, the tax payers are. Which is why the state always has unlimited funds and wants to keep pushing for discovery and experts.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Even the justices the dissented in Bruen have to see the open insurrection of the inferior courts and be concerned with the rule of law not being followed.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I’ve done something with pictures.
Showed a picture of an MP Ar 15 chambered in 5.56 and an MP chambered in 22lr and asked which one was a scary black rifle that should be banned.
They couldn’t understand how they looked identical and one would be legal and one would not be.
Sent from my...
It is too bad an attorney would probably be censured, held in contempt, and arrested for interrupting the rambling judge to first thank him for his service and then ask why that is relevant to an arms ban case. And each time the judge states it for the public protection to interrupt and say but...
Maybe 8-1 to give a single dissent to the opinion but stating the dissent in no way is encouraging the behavior of the “inferior courts”
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The ending seemed bad. He got run over.
And F that female judge that snapped her fingers at him saying “I’m over here”.
That is so condescending and unprofessional to snap your fingers at someone that way.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It is 100% being remanded for more discovery on “common use” and what number is common.
That’ll take years because they’ll spend a year finding numbers that support, filing briefs, rebuttals then scheduling oral arguments.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Our attorney needs to just say “it’s clear my points will not sway you and at this time we rest and look forward to the Supreme Court reviewing the transcripts”
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk