fivepointstar
Thank you MD-Goodbye
I'll have to admit that my knowledge of modern battle rifles is pretty weak but I'm coming around and relying on the MDS Community to educate me. There just so much to learn about FAL's, AR15's, CETME, H&K's, etc etc. I'll come back to those another time.
My questions are on AK-47 quality. If the AK-47 is incredibly reliable, whats the difference in the AK's from various countries? I would say, if an AK is and AK is an AK, then why does it matter. I know there was/are problems with the QC of CAI receivers. But not counting Aesthetics, why should I want a Saiga over an Arsenal over a Yugo over a Norinco over a Romy??
What about the AK variants.....are Galil and Valmets (am i missing any) AK variants and what makes them variants. Other than aesthetics, the looks and working components seem to be AK
Other than the way the receiver was manufactured, what is the difference b/n a milled receiver and a stamped receiver. Correct me if I'm wrong but you can identify the milled by the dimples in the receiver.
What am I missing?
Is there a book that can help me over all with the battle rifles of the world?
THANK YOU!!!
My questions are on AK-47 quality. If the AK-47 is incredibly reliable, whats the difference in the AK's from various countries? I would say, if an AK is and AK is an AK, then why does it matter. I know there was/are problems with the QC of CAI receivers. But not counting Aesthetics, why should I want a Saiga over an Arsenal over a Yugo over a Norinco over a Romy??
What about the AK variants.....are Galil and Valmets (am i missing any) AK variants and what makes them variants. Other than aesthetics, the looks and working components seem to be AK
Other than the way the receiver was manufactured, what is the difference b/n a milled receiver and a stamped receiver. Correct me if I'm wrong but you can identify the milled by the dimples in the receiver.
What am I missing?
Is there a book that can help me over all with the battle rifles of the world?
THANK YOU!!!