1ceman
Active Member
- Dec 26, 2013
- 592
This is so wrong in so many ways.
Cash is king but that can even be captured on video.
Cash is king but that can even be captured on video.
So serious question: between this, CT, all the executive orders; is this administration actively TRYING to incite a revolt?
I think they are doing everything they can to force the citizenry to fire the first shot.
Could an individual purchaser go after ep in a civil suit for damages if ATF came knocking for the 80%?
Could an individual purchaser go after ep in a civil suit for damages if ATF came knocking for the 80%?
This is exactly why they are playing it the way they are ... "playing victim" to get sympathy to reduce the number of people who eventually join the class action suit against them.
These guys are running an effective propaganda program and eventually ruining a lot of business in the legitimate 80% lower market
If the ATF knocked on everyones door who bought one, they may just be happy enough if the lower was turned over without question.
I am sure the whole 2A community is watching this with baited breath.
The wording of the restraining order did not ask ATF not to do a criminal enforcement raid; the order specifically allowed a criminal enforcement raid. Ares was blowing BS PR smoke. Apparently the court order only applied to civil action by ATF and Ares knew it.
ATF was well within the court order and the whole thing is playing out like a ballet choreographed BY BOTH SIDES.
The wording of the restraining order did not ask ATF not to do a criminal enforcement raid; the order specifically allowed a criminal enforcement raid. Ares was blowing BS PR smoke. Apparently the court order only applied to civil action by ATF and Ares knew it.
ATF was well within the court order and the whole thing is playing out like a ballet choreographed BY BOTH SIDES.
A civil restraining order doesn't mean squat against a criminal search warrant that a judge deems to be legal.
I think we can all agree that BATFE at this point is lying about their understanding of the EP80 manufacturing process. They've been corrected and they continue to ignore it.
Obviously their Goal #1 is to push the lie as fast, as hard as they can and see how strongly it reverberates, and what traction they can get politically; Goal #2 will be to settle down, provide a "real" analysis of whether the EP80 is legal, and pursue the case(s) at hand, assuming (big assumption) that they didn't Deep-6 their own case due to their actions in #1 above.
If the tro had no effect why did they file a ex parte motion wherein they lied about not having been given service in order to have the judge rule on the issue without giving me a chance to file a response. Then waited to they received a clarification on the order before acting. Let's see what they file on Monday and what happens on Thursday before jumping the gun here.
If the tro had no effect why did they file a ex parte motion wherein they lied about not having been given service in order to have the judge rule on the issue without giving me a chance to file a response. Then waited to they received a clarification on the order before acting. Let's see what they file on Monday and what happens on Thursday before jumping the gun here.