Cold Steel
Active Member
I was reading about the Charter Arms Bulldog earlier today and it got me thinking about a stainless steel version I had back in the 80s. I got a .38 Spc snubbie and the Bulldog. The former always seemed a bit fragile, but I loved the looks of the Bulldog, especially the tapered barrel. Alas, both guns failed after shooting them double action. The snubbie was the only small frame .38 I could find, as only cops could get S&W 60/36 models. As for the Bulldog, it was the only thing I could find that would fit in my pocket.
My problem with both guns is that when they got hot, they would bind to such an extent that I would have to wait until they cooled off before they would work again. I had a good friend who was a Treasury agent and he got a Bulldog as well, and he had similar problems with his. I sold mine to another LEO with full disclosure, but my friend and the guy I sold it to kept them strictly for self defense. One could easily get two cylinder-fulls before each of these Bulldogs before they would got hot enough to act up, so after cleaning them they used them only for carrying. I don't recall what I did with the .38, but I didn't keep it.
Now that the Bulldogs are being made again, I don't know whether they have problems or not. Do any of you have have them and if so, did they work pretty well? Later, I got a couple of stainless Rossi 3-inch .38s. I ended up selling one to a friend and the other is here in the drawer and I've never fired it. They are gems! They had no tool marks and came with a high polish! Many S&W stainless revolvers come with horrible finishes, like someone used sandpaper on them, and the only difference between quality between them and the S&W 60 I later acquired is the scrolling on the ejector rod. It's a bit better on the S&W, but the Rossi functional seems to be every bit as good as the Smith.
But about the Bulldog, does anyone have one? And if so, any problems? (Oh, one more thing. How much is the stainless Bulldog going for there days?)
S&W 60 (top) and Rossi M88.
Rossi 3-inch M88
My problem with both guns is that when they got hot, they would bind to such an extent that I would have to wait until they cooled off before they would work again. I had a good friend who was a Treasury agent and he got a Bulldog as well, and he had similar problems with his. I sold mine to another LEO with full disclosure, but my friend and the guy I sold it to kept them strictly for self defense. One could easily get two cylinder-fulls before each of these Bulldogs before they would got hot enough to act up, so after cleaning them they used them only for carrying. I don't recall what I did with the .38, but I didn't keep it.
Now that the Bulldogs are being made again, I don't know whether they have problems or not. Do any of you have have them and if so, did they work pretty well? Later, I got a couple of stainless Rossi 3-inch .38s. I ended up selling one to a friend and the other is here in the drawer and I've never fired it. They are gems! They had no tool marks and came with a high polish! Many S&W stainless revolvers come with horrible finishes, like someone used sandpaper on them, and the only difference between quality between them and the S&W 60 I later acquired is the scrolling on the ejector rod. It's a bit better on the S&W, but the Rossi functional seems to be every bit as good as the Smith.
But about the Bulldog, does anyone have one? And if so, any problems? (Oh, one more thing. How much is the stainless Bulldog going for there days?)
S&W 60 (top) and Rossi M88.
Rossi 3-inch M88
Last edited: