Ok, so from a long-term strategy perspective, what's the anti-gun establishment's best bet? Do they roll the dice with the courts, and if they lose, they not only lose big in Maryland, but it has the possibility of creating national precedent, or do they actually repeal the law so they can approach it from another angle later?
And which would be better for us? While SS looks great, is there a chance we could eventually still lose in the courts?
We could most certainly still lose in the courts. This is just one Circuit. Not all are saying the SS needs applied to 2A cases, though if you look at which cases require SS, those dealing with the core of a Right most certainly do. Every time these idiots pass a law, they run the risk of it back-firing on them down the road.
SS is going to be a very hard standard against which to pass an AWB. The State CANNOT show a compelling government interest. The decision was pretty clear on this. "Assault weapons" just aren't used in crimes, and the Judge also stated something to the effect that you cannot infringe upon a right based on what could be. I doubt the District Court can figure a way around this and I doubt the CA4 will overturn itself on this one. This precedent will stand unless SCOTUS agrees to hear it.