Looking for some data....Im trying to present the argument in a different way to representatives who dont care about rights but do care about money (my tax dollars).
For example the millionaires tax fiasco....they now collect less than they did before they raised taxes because so many left the state.
So please help shoot some holes in my assumptions.
There are 43k registered "assault weapons" in Maryland right now, loosely assuming that there is 1 weapon per owner and the majority of owners fit the standard demographic (male, 25-45, middle to upper middle class) then each owner pays about $15k-20k in maryland taxes a year. Assuming that 10% of the group splits the state if the ban takes place that is 4300x15000 or $65 million in tax revenue plus $14 million in sales tax revenue (cause we will be shopping elsewhere too). $80 million in lost revenue seems like something that might make people pay attention.
Do my numbers make sense? I realize that most people own more than one reigstered gun, but there are also a number of people who brought guns into the state when they moved here and never "voluntarily registered" them (as you do when you buy one).
Thoughts?
For example the millionaires tax fiasco....they now collect less than they did before they raised taxes because so many left the state.
So please help shoot some holes in my assumptions.
There are 43k registered "assault weapons" in Maryland right now, loosely assuming that there is 1 weapon per owner and the majority of owners fit the standard demographic (male, 25-45, middle to upper middle class) then each owner pays about $15k-20k in maryland taxes a year. Assuming that 10% of the group splits the state if the ban takes place that is 4300x15000 or $65 million in tax revenue plus $14 million in sales tax revenue (cause we will be shopping elsewhere too). $80 million in lost revenue seems like something that might make people pay attention.
Do my numbers make sense? I realize that most people own more than one reigstered gun, but there are also a number of people who brought guns into the state when they moved here and never "voluntarily registered" them (as you do when you buy one).
Thoughts?