Glass vs Power; Where do I Put My Money?

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • calicojack

    American Sporting Rifle
    MDS Supporter
    May 29, 2018
    5,425
    Cuba on the Chesapeake
    What's better for a longer reach; a 12X with nice glass or a 16X or 18X with average glass? I have a Monarch 12X that I was thinking of replacing for a bit more reach but I am thinking don't bother unless I want to put down good money.
     

    TheOriginalMexicanBob

    Ultimate Member
    BANNED!!!
    Jul 2, 2017
    33,290
    Sun City West, AZ
    I don't have a definitive answer but I liken it to both stereo or photo equipment. To get the best results plan on spending 50% of your total outlay on either stereo speakers or the lenses.
     

    Allen65

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Jun 29, 2013
    7,195
    Anne Arundel County
    Go with the better glass, you may find you can get away with less magnification with the higher-quality, clearer, distortion-free optics. Once you've used a Nightforce, Steiner, or higher-end Leupold, you'll never go back to the cheap stuff. In the long run, you won't regret buying better glass rather than specs.
     
    Last edited:

    Boats

    Broken Member
    Mar 13, 2012
    4,133
    Howeird County
    What's better for a longer reach; a 12X with nice glass or a 16X or 18X with average glass? I have a Monarch 12X that I was thinking of replacing for a bit more reach but I am thinking don't bother unless I want to put down good money.

    Glass quality, hands down.

    Most of the longest military sniper confirmed kills were done with low powered (considering the ranges they occurred) but good quality glass (Hathcock used an 8x Unterl Scope, for example, The MacMillan TAC-50 has a scope that tops out at 25x.)

    From personal experience, I would rather have a fixed 10x power scope with excellent glass and repeatability than a variable power scope with average glass and mechanicals.
     
    Last edited:

    calicojack

    American Sporting Rifle
    MDS Supporter
    May 29, 2018
    5,425
    Cuba on the Chesapeake
    I don't have a definitive answer but I liken it to both stereo or photo equipment. To get the best results plan on spending 50% of your total outlay on either stereo speakers or the lenses.

    This is a killer deal on a darn good scope.
    .
    Yeah - I think the Viper model is the minimum I should consider.
     

    AlBeight

    Member
    MDS Supporter
    Mar 30, 2017
    4,552
    Hampstead
    The two aren’t always mutually exclusive. High “power” (magnification) optics can also have really good quality glass. Neither feature will be cheap though despite what all the curmudgeons will tell you.

    I’ll submit to you that most people can’t really tell ‘quality glass’ from standard or average glass. Some you can tell a difference if you look at them immediately one after the other if viewed at the same object in the exact same lighting. Same thing with speakers, headphones, etc...it’s just too subjective. Kind of like when you see a hidden camera video of people pranking wine “experts” with cheap box wines in expensive labeled bottles, they'll regale you with their ‘knowledge’ of it’s vintage, its ‘earth tones’, its ‘nutty flavor’, and so on. Same with the beer “experts” that extoll the virtues of the “craft brew” they’re drinking when it’s actually just Budweiser in a fancy draft glass.

    Buy the most “glass” you can afford, in whatever magnification you need (or just want). I doubt you'll end up with poor “glass” quality. If you can attend a PRS or long range shooting match, ask a few shooters to look through some of their optics. Some will be incredible, others will be just very good, though I seriously doubt you’d turn away thinking that ‘boy that one sucked’.
     

    smokey

    2A TEACHER
    Jan 31, 2008
    31,552
    This is a killer deal on a darn good scope.
    .
    That is a great friggin deal. I have it's little bro(5-25×56 venom) on my grendel and paid just a couple bucks under. It's very impressive and makes me feel like I'm cheating at 300 yds and in.
    20220319_142630.jpg

    20220305_193409.jpg
     

    gwchem

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Dec 18, 2014
    3,447
    SoMD
    I would put your money on being sure the elevation turret will track properly. Swfa, trijicon, night force. Vortex is known for their great warranty, because tons of people have to use it.
     

    AlBeight

    Member
    MDS Supporter
    Mar 30, 2017
    4,552
    Hampstead
    If your budget forces a compromise, go with optical quality every time. And a reticle that fits your needs.
    In theory this is sound advice, but for someone shopping for a new optic, how can you discern “optical quality” while shopping in a catalog, or website? It’s a highly individually subjective quality. It’s not like it’s an actual score or number provided in the product specs.
     

    E.Shell

    Ultimate Member
    Feb 5, 2007
    10,349
    Mid-Merlind
    I'd add my own 1.5 cents - buy better glass and don't go overboard on chasing magnification. The atmospheric conditions are usually such that by the time you get beyond 22-25x, you can can't see any better due to haze and mirage. Not only is the target magnified, but so is everything else in between and I have often dialed down below 20x to see better at 1k and beyond.
     

    Uncle Duke

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Feb 2, 2013
    11,744
    Not Far Enough from the City
    Optics are always a challenge, and usually even moreso because very few folks have the money to buy examples of the higher end products to be able to sample differences.

    All scopes are compromises. Try to remove as many of the many variables up front as you can. For example, what duties will it serve? Hunting or bench or both? Reticle type? Mil or minute? First or second focal plane? Straight power fine, with money dedicated instead of variable mechanics to good straight power glass? Or you'll want to pay more for the mechanics of variable, because you see need or want for variable? High end magnification matters more, which can be great on a bench but effectively useless in a woods? Or what matters more is low end magnification and field of view functionality?

    Try to boil things down to a handful of possible makes and models. Then publish your thoughts, and see if someone here has what you're considering. You might get lucky. Hard to know what you've getting, with a product you've never been and can't otherwise afford to get behind.
     
    Last edited:

    RRomig

    Ultimate Member
    Industry Partner
    MDS Supporter
    Aug 30, 2021
    1,963
    Burtonsville MD
    I get sensory overload every time I go optics shopping. So many choices but use your budget then priorities with some trusted brands. Midway is a great site to see many different brands and specs whether you buy there or not. As someone said get your short list together and post up to see if anyone has personal experience. GL
     

    4g64loser

    Bad influence
    Jan 18, 2007
    6,591
    maryland
    In theory this is sound advice, but for someone shopping for a new optic, how can you discern “optical quality” while shopping in a catalog, or website? It’s a highly individually subjective quality. It’s not like it’s an actual score or number provided in the product specs.
    Actually, there are some testable values in th world of optics. And I do my comparison shopping at matches or in the lockers of my friends. They do the same with my locker. I have multiple Razor two vortex scopes, a kahles, a zeiss, and couple burris xtr2 variants. When I bought the kahles, it was after trying two out that belonged to friends. My first razor was based on playing with one that belonged to a guy in my squad at a match.

    You should hang out at a couple of precision rifle matches. It will offer you the "gun counter" of top shelf optics to check out.
     

    Boats

    Broken Member
    Mar 13, 2012
    4,133
    Howeird County
    I would put your money on being sure the elevation turret will track properly. Swfa, trijicon, night force. Vortex is known for their great warranty, because tons of people have to use it.

    I throw Sightron into the consideration pile too.

    Kinda have to agree about Vortex. Would rather have a primary arms, if I had to choose
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,716
    Messages
    7,292,601
    Members
    33,503
    Latest member
    ObsidianCC

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom