Everyone needs to go out and buy another regulated firearm!
implying accountability in government
There will be a scapegoat/fallguy or two but not much else.
Even a lawsuit is not going to unwind this mess. Too much information, too many agencies, too many people with full access now.
The cat is out of the bag.
Despite rock solid evidence the people in charge still walk away with freedom and pensions intact, ala Dixon.
The best we can hope is further points to take down the HQL and maybe having the state pay for credit monitoring for those affected.
Everyone needs to go out and buy another regulated firearm!
Tyler,
I have drafted communication demanding that the State create a list of all persons who have had access to the records and that the state be willing to run a background check to confirm a clean background. Anything less is unacceptable.
I will keep you posted.
Cathy Vitale
Quite true for anyplace that has high level security, but performing all the background checks and polygraphs and the host of other checks that are done does a fairly good job of minimizing that risk, but it will always be there. I for one needed to wait 116 days to be allowed to take my Glock home and each and every day I was waiting I had full access to a Nuclear Power Plant. I can work there for the past 23 years but needed 4 months to get the O.K. for a pistol??????
What if, rather than waiting to flood them with HQL apps come 9/15 (or so), folks start submitting PIA requests to find out:
who has touched/viewed the apps
have they been properly screened,
and are they properly attached to MSP (per existing law/regs)
Why do you want a pistol? You'll poke your eye out with that thing, kid.
(sarcasm)
Why do you want a pistol? You'll poke your eye out with that thing, kid.
(sarcasm)
Sounds like a plan, currently I have the following two questions:
Whom do we send the questions to?
What law/regs do we quote?
I cite again COMAR 29.03.01.06 which expressly states, "The State Police shall review the application for accuracy, omissions, or discrepancies before investigating the applicant".
There is also another regulation in COMAR 29.03.01.03, Subsection A, (8) it states, "In order to verify the accuracy of the applicant's representations, the applicant's written authorization to the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, or any other similar agency or department of another state, to disclose to the Department of State Police information as to whether the applicant:" This section is talking about the mental health component of the application in order to verify the applicant's truthfulness in completing the application. The signature of the applicant only gives authorization for state agencies to disclose information to the MD State Police. It does not allow the State Police to disclose information to OTHER agencies, which is exactly what they are doing.
You have to have proof of injured parties.
Right now all we see is the POTENTIAL for it.
Mental anguish and high blood pressure?
Shocked, I tell you, just shocked - WTOP has removed the article from the front page, the overall page for Maryland News, and made sure to have enough news in the "Maryland News Stream" to keep the article off of the first page of scrolled links (IOW - no one will find it unless they go looking specifically for it). I also did not hear anything from them while listening for about 1.5 hours this afternoon in the car.
Dear concerned citizen,
I too received this information from the AGC email alert and am disturbed by it as well.
I am working closely with Associated Gun Clubs and other pro-Second Amendment organizations to investigate this very serious issue. This type of information sharing among state agencies violates Maryland regulations.
Unfortunately, the O'Malley/Brown Administration is anti-Second Amendment and therefore will not be helpful. This may be yet another issue that requires legal action.
Thank you for your email regarding 77R forms being distributed to agencies beyond the Maryland State Police.
Sincerely,
Nic Kipke
State Delegate