MSRPA and MSI still list them as oppose ...My understanding is as amended these prohibit loans to someone if you know they are not allowed to possess a firearm, is that correct?
https://www.msrpa.org/2019-maryland-general-assembly-bill-tracker/
https://www.marylandshallissue.org/jmain/legislation-tracker/164-msi-2019-gun-legislation-tracker
As I read the legislation (unless I missed the redaction), it still reads that you have to transfer a firearm that you want to lend to anyone (unless always in your presence) through an FFL.
Despite the burden (both time and expense), a recipient could decide to keep the firearm, and I'm not sure what one's recourse is. Is it considered stolen or would you have needed to prepare a contract for return (which also needs to go through an FFL)?
As was brought up in testimony, what of family members that share a safe and an owner of some of the firearms leaves home with the other remaining home?
I'm thinking that the don't sell to prohibited persons bill modification was to the even more odious LQL legislation which was thankfully gutted.
Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk