Taurus is hit or miss with their guns. Their clones are good but their own designs are hit or miss. you will get a lot of opinions but ultimately its your call.looked at a gx4 taurus , felt good in my hand , anybody have / shot one ?
No offense, but your opinion is outdated and the OP is very much welcome here. The new stuff is pretty damn nice.The whole brand is a hard pass for me. I would suggest finding a Taurus dedicated forum.
What is funny some of the legacy brands (S&W, Remington, etc) had times in their existence where QA/QC fell off and they had high returns/repairs as well.I have had several gun store owners tell me that Taurus over the last several years, has gone from one of their most returned/serviced brands to one of their least returned/serviced brands.
I get that a lot of people still feel the way they do about them, but to have the kind of sentiment change I have seen, in this industry, is nothing short of miraculous.
Well, just not native to Taurus, but pretty much any modern manufactured handgun rarely needs to be cleaned. Lubed however, is a different story. They need to be slick.i have a friend who has a , is it a gc2 ? . he abuses it , throws it in the center console ( he lives in a free state ) gets it out to shoot it , not sure if he ever cleans it properly , it always goes bang . this is why i'm looking at taurus .
I rented one along with a ( redacted) and a ( redacted) . I loved everything about it but it wasn't as accurate (for me) as the others. At 5yds, my 10-shot group was like 5" for the ( redacted) vs 2" for both the ( redacted & redacted) . I loved everything else about it, and I still hit the silhouette, but I plan to get the ( redacted) for my EDC.