As usual I am struggling with interpreting the amendments.
At a high level it appears that they are removing the language of defining a transfer as a loan and inserting “sale, rental or transfer” in its place.
Later on it looks like the Chow decision language is being inserted. Meaning that temporary loans, gratuitous or not are okay so long as you don’t believe the person to be prohibited or will be using the firearm in a crime.
Also allowing transfers between step grand parents and their step grandchildren.
Some inheritance type language.
Reducing the penalty to 6 months.
Requiring FFLs to charge no more than $30 to facilitate a transfer (is that ALL transfers? Or just long guns? Fuzzy on that)
Is that pretty much covering it?
At a high level it appears that they are removing the language of defining a transfer as a loan and inserting “sale, rental or transfer” in its place.
Later on it looks like the Chow decision language is being inserted. Meaning that temporary loans, gratuitous or not are okay so long as you don’t believe the person to be prohibited or will be using the firearm in a crime.
Also allowing transfers between step grand parents and their step grandchildren.
Some inheritance type language.
Reducing the penalty to 6 months.
Requiring FFLs to charge no more than $30 to facilitate a transfer (is that ALL transfers? Or just long guns? Fuzzy on that)
Is that pretty much covering it?