I’m baffled by the judge flirting with the idea that putting yourself at risk is a choice of your own, and that permits aren’t really about that. Isn’t deciding to pursue a career as an officer of the court or (wait for it!) owning your business the same thing? The entire G&S construct is built on such flimsy philosophical ground.
Taylor said that when he applied that the applicant didn’t know who did the drive by shooting. And said that he was prohibited but didn’t say why specifically.
Now Taylor said that he doesn’t have any prohibitors I must have heard him wrong. Applicant said that he was set to testify against the gang members but that they reached a deal with the State’s Attorney and were given PBJ a year ago.
Next applicant is a black female, I rode up in the elevator with her. She is a security guard who had a charge against her and petitioned for expungement. Apparently she just filed last Friday.
Next applicant is passing out some documentation of recent Navy Small Arms instructor and is active duty. Also has an article about a growing trend of violence towards US Military members.
Subject to the OPM data breach and move.mil data breach. Has a S clearance now, formerly had a TS.