Interesting facts on Type 94 Nambu

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Jul 1, 2012
    5,742
    I agree the CZ.38 is a worse pistol in some ways :)
    Terrible ergonomics, horrid double-action only trigger, the issue with the slide slamming forward when removing the magazine (but common to other CZ pistols of the day).

    The Type 94 exposed trigger bar (or sear bar) was a horrid idea but about the only way it could be with the rest of the design. The trigger itself is a non-robust POS as well with a spring-loaded, wedge-shaped block to drive the trigger bar. It doesn't make for a smooth crisp trigger pull :innocent0
     

    Attachments

    • trigger.JPG
      trigger.JPG
      148.1 KB · Views: 175

    Combloc

    Stop Negassing me!!!!!
    Nov 10, 2010
    7,280
    In a House
    I used to have a relatively early production TYPE 94 in factory unissued condition. If you cocked it, applied the safety, squeezed and released the trigger and then flipped the safety off, the pistol would fire as the safety was disengaged. Quality!!!!!!
     

    bean93x

    JamBandGalore
    Mar 27, 2008
    4,571
    WV
    I’ve only put two rounds through mine. PCI stuff is junk and I’m too afraid to break something original..

    Steinel has ammo they load for it that match original specs apparently. It’s not cheap though.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,806
    Messages
    7,296,433
    Members
    33,524
    Latest member
    Jtlambo

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom