jpo183
Ultimate Member
Some Departments I know have made the switch. Delaware has also switch to 9mm from 40.
This is another interesting thing. Can anyone confirm other departments and why? I always thought the .40 had better ballistics.
Some Departments I know have made the switch. Delaware has also switch to 9mm from 40.
The M&P does more effectively adapt to different hand sizes. For an Agency this is an important thing. For any one individual , not so much. If a pistol fits your hand , the ability to change it is moot.
But overall , we have entered a new era in LE handgun, after about 100yrs , there is not longer a one or two guns , in one or two cals dominating the LE market. There are 4 or so top ranked (by sales) pistol families , and at least another half dozen fully viable choices. , chambered in any of 4 popular cals , with a cpl more viable , if less popular choices. No single combo is dominate , and all are in at least some usage.
Not like when 90% of LE handguns were Colt or S&W .38Spl , or even when 75% of LE handguns were Berretta or Glock 9mms.
I always thought the .40 had better ballistics.
This is another interesting thing. Can anyone confirm other departments and why? I always thought the .40 had better ballistics.
Give this a read: http://www.thebangswitch.com/the-fading-40/
Give this a read: http://www.thebangswitch.com/the-fading-40/
M&P fits people better IMHO. The Glock is easy to get parts for.
It is this exactly.
Smith and wesson established it's self as a synonym for "gun" a few decades ago by providing extremely cheap guns to police. People always want what the police have, and so it was fantastic advertising and branding.
They are doing the same thing with the M&P series of guns, selling them to police at nearly wholesale.
I personally hate the M&P series, and anything smith has made for the past five or so years.
I've had a horrible run of guns I've got from Smith the past few years, and I am not alone. Their quality control has gone to shit.
Even so, when the M&P came out I was eager to get one, since it had a lot of things I like in a handgun, and seemed to be very comfortable. Even after seeing how ridiculously terrible the barrel lockup was, (when the gun is in battery you can literally wiggle the barrel around a good two millimeters) I still bought it.
The slide cracked in the first 50 rounds, and then after sending me my gun back after repairs from the factory that took nearly a month, the damn slide cracked AGAIN! I sent it back, and they got it back to me after another 3 weeks, and it worked fine for a couple boxes of ammo- well not fine, accuracy was crap- and then I hear a strange sound after a round goes off.
I check the gun and don't find anything wrong immediately, but then when I get home and take it apart for cleaning I see that a chunk of the slide, about the size of half my pinkie fingernail had detached from the bushing area where the barrel protrudes from the slide, on the inside bottom part. It was like someone had taken a chip out of a brittle piece of pottery, the edge being sharp and having left a scratch on the bottom part of the barrel.
I irately called smith and they gave me a ration of shit, saying that I must be using the gun wrong. I told them I could understand how they could think that since the thing was so crappy it fell apart three times, but I assured them it was not.
I eventually got it repaired, and sold it to an acquaintance for a large loss.
That same friend got a 15-22 and to this day we can not get it to feed a full magazine without jamming at least once.
But yeah, when you can get 2 and a half M&Ps for the price of a Glock, it makes a difference in the procurement decision.