Here's an article from the Altoona (PA) Mirror that made me consider the SB281 mental health issues as of October 1st:
http://www.altoonamirror.com/page/c...2/Judge-denies-man-gun-ownership.html?nav=742
This individual petitioned to have his mental health records expunged and had the support (via letter) from a doctor.
He was denied on the basis doing so would "give him unfettered access to guns".
Now interestingly enough, this individual has a suffiently long record of other issues that are NOT mental health based that I would assume that even in PA, would at least flag him for review, if not get him rejected outright.
I feel that not permitting his mental health records to not be expunged (since he has a doctors support) is wrong.
However, I also scratch my head about the fact he would have "unfettered access" with all of his other issues.
Discussion, opinions?
http://www.altoonamirror.com/page/c...2/Judge-denies-man-gun-ownership.html?nav=742
This individual petitioned to have his mental health records expunged and had the support (via letter) from a doctor.
He was denied on the basis doing so would "give him unfettered access to guns".
Now interestingly enough, this individual has a suffiently long record of other issues that are NOT mental health based that I would assume that even in PA, would at least flag him for review, if not get him rejected outright.
I feel that not permitting his mental health records to not be expunged (since he has a doctors support) is wrong.
However, I also scratch my head about the fact he would have "unfettered access" with all of his other issues.
Discussion, opinions?