Montgomery County Bill 21-22

[mac1_131]

"now that it's effectively gotten Judicial sign-off?"

No. Just the PI is denied. I don't think it's been ruled on its merits yet.

And I suspect Mark will move things to the next level now.

 

[Bob A]

That WAS Fast for the Judge. 40 pages too.

The Bloomberg/Soros team has probably been working on it for months.

Judge Chuang to SCOTUS - FU.

 

[Sloopjonb]

Welcome to Montgomery County; trying hard to become the new Baltimore.

Increase Section 8 housing, defund the police, bring in more New Americans, and make the county a Gun-Free Zone. (And encourage bounties on SCOTUS justices; take two out and we'll reverse Bruen.)

Wow must be hell living in Md. I moved away in 74 to a red state. I can leave my house like right now its 4pm and have a new hand gun rifle etc by 5 and walking out if I go to the closest place and know what I want. My next purchase will be an AR sometime around Christmas when the prices are lower.

 

[Mister F]

Losing is as good as winning. Ok, not as good as we’d like. Either way it would be appealed. We all knew “sensitive places” was next element of jurisprudence to be explored. Welcome to the very cutting edge of law !


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Some Guy]

Check out this section on churches:



Insanity.

Given this restriction, I'm thinking a number of people will become certified and "independent" Maryland Security Guards.

Interest balancing, prima facia. This is patently contrary to Bruen.

 

[Bob A]

No. Just the PI is denied. I don't think it's been ruled on its merits yet.

Actually, the judge did address multiple points which he determined would fail upon review.

One of my favorites is the Hospital issue. Apparently they didn't exist in modern form, so the County couldn't have found regulations regarding their being sensitive places. And yet the court decided the County had sufficiently demonstrated historical basis for restrictions, apparently in the absence of any restrictions. (Page 33, if you care).

 

[Sunrise]

No. Just the PI is denied. I don't think it's been ruled on its merits yet.

And I suspect Mark will move things to the next level now.

It's being appealed to the Fourth Circuit:

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

www.ca4.uscourts.gov

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[annihilation-time]

Outrageous

 

[Bob A]

Losing is as good as winning. Ok, not as good as we’d like. Either way it would be appealed. We all knew “sensitive places” was next element of jurisprudence to be explored. Welcome to the very cutting edge of law !


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah, sharp as a hammer.

 

[Sunrise]

Interest balancing, prima facia. This is patently contrary to Bruen.

View attachment 421282

It seems this Judge has effectively determined that Bruen, which does away with a "two-step interest balancing" test (Page 8 of the SCOTUS Ruling), does not apparently prohibit a "two-step interest balancing" test from being used when assessing a preliminary injunction.

Incredible.

 

[Sunrise]

Outrageous

I hope this is smacked down hard on appeal and soon.

 

[zx10guy]

And hence my comments that SCOTUS needs to get off their asses and do their job. It's obvious these local politicians are giving them the middle finger on their authority. Yet they sit back and do nothing.

 

[Mightydog]

Idiots guide one page synopsis…..total B.S.

 

[dblas]

When/ how did they slip that one by?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This year.

 

[teratos]

And hence my comments that SCOTUS needs to get off their asses and do their job. It's obvious these local politicians are giving them the middle finger on their authority. Yet they sit back and do nothing.

That’s really not how this works. It needs to go through the proper progression.

 

[outrider58]

And hence my comments that SCOTUS needs to get off their asses and do their job. It's obvious these local politicians are giving them the middle finger on their authority. Yet they sit back and do nothing.

As per your original plaint, the SCOTUS has "ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all federal court cases, and over state court cases that involve a point of U.S. Constitutional or federal law". That's their purview.

They are doing their job.

 

[rbird7282]

Interest balancing, prima facia. This is patently contrary to Bruen.

View attachment 421282

Yep.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[rbird7282]

I hope this is smacked down hard on appeal and soon.

Going to the 4th circuit, it’s doubtful


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Sunrise]

Going to the 4th circuit, it’s doubtful


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm holding out what hope I can...

I wish this could be fast tracked to SCOTUS.

 

[zx10guy]

That’s really not how this works. It needs to go through the proper progression.

And that's the crap that's causing all this erosion of the 2A. The Democrats know this and the poster that said Bruen isn't the magic bullet everyone is making it out to be is spot on.

As per your original plaint, the SCOTUS has "ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all federal court cases, and over state court cases that involve a point of U.S. Constitutional or federal law". That's their purview.

They are doing their job.

They can choose to hear cases that are presented to them directly that pertain to the violation of Bruen but they have chosen not to. If they are serious with their rulings, they would fast track any unconstitutional laws that are obviously violating their ruling. They're not. The Democrats know this and are just happy to tie up our 2A rights in litigation.

Bruen might as well never have happened.